atlas

Research map / Optimization / Optimizers

Stochastic Adaptive Quasi-Newton Methods for Minimizing Expected Values

ICML 2017 · Optimization › Optimizers · approach: SGD momentum and step-size schedules · 23 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace fixed step size with adaptive step size t_k = alpha_k/(1+alpha_k delta_k) in SA-GDSA-GD · penalized least squares random design (p=100, 500; rho varied)log(f(x)-f(x*)) vs CPU timeMixed
Use increasing sample sizes m_k = 1/2 p + 1.01^k in SA-GD (ablation)SA-GD · penalized least squares random design (p=100, 500)fluctuation/descent of log optimality gap vs CPU timeNo clear effect
Use increasing sample sizes m_k = 1/2 p + 1.01^k in SA-BFGS (ablation)SA-BFGS · penalized least squares random design (p=100, 500)log optimality gap vs CPU timeMixed
Fall back to SA-GD step when Wolfe condition fails in SA-BFGS (SA-BFGS-GD) (ablation)SA-BFGS · penalized least squares random design (p=100)log optimality gap vs CPU timeHelped
Use fixed sample size m_k=p with BFGS instead of GD direction (ablation)SA-BFGS vs SA-GD · penalized least squares random designlog optimality gap vs CPU timeHurt

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy