AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Optimization / Nonconvex and smooth optimization

Complexity of nonconvex first-order methods

Derives rates for finding stationary points using first-order and inexact-oracle methods.

79 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Nonconvex and smooth optimization, keyword cluster “complexity · bilevel · stationary”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

25 papers in 2023–24 and 18 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.8% to 5.1%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 1172018: 3182019: 8192020: 6202021: 8212022: 7222023: 13232024: 12242025: 11252026: 726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

62 papers here report 349 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 66%, no clear effect 13%, hurt 16%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Increase rewind from 7-10% to 74% with σ = 0.01Lacuna-100 unlearn · AUC0.9238 -> 0.8998HelpedRewind-to-Delete: Certified Machine Unlearning for Nonconvex Functions (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Increase CSI uncertainty region radius eps from 0 to 0.1Networked ISAC simulation (L=3, J=2) · WSR and CRLBHurtGPU-Accelerated Parallel Bilevel Optimization for Roubst 6G ISAC (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Use adaptive batch sizes for gradient-difference estimatesPrivate SOSP gradient estimation · gradient-estimation accuracyHelpedAdaptive Batch Size for Privately Finding Second-Order Stationary Points (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)
Use one golden-ratio line search per iteration rather than twoQuadratic optimization experiment · convergenceHelpedAcceleration Exists! Optimization Problems When Oracle Can Only Compare Objective Function Values (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
Add nonlinear zeroth order cuts instead of using linear cutsrobust hyperparameter optimization · average across accuracyHelpedDTZO: Distributed Trilevel Zeroth Order Learning with Provable Non-Asymptotic Convergence (ICML 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 14 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 2 of 14 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 43 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy