AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning

Meta-learning analysis and benchmarks

Analyzes meta-learned representations and builds benchmarks and Bayesian or convex-optimization learners.

50 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2018–2026) · an approach in Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning, keyword cluster “maml · meta algorithms · meta meta”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

7 papers in 2023–24 and 4 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 3.4% to 2.3%.

No longer reported by papers here: miniImageNet 5-way 5-shot (accuracy, last in 2024); miniImageNet 5-way 1-shot (accuracy, last in 2024); tieredImageNet 5-way 5-shot (accuracy, last in 2024); CIFAR-FS 5-way 1-shot (accuracy (%), last in 2022); CIFAR-FS 5-way 5-shot (accuracy (%), last in 2022); Omniglot 20-way 1-shot (accuracy, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 1182019: 8192020: 8202021: 10212022: 12222023: 5232024: 2242025: 3252026: 126

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

miniImageNet 5-way 5-shot · accuracy (higher is better)

10 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 802022: 86.12
20192024

miniImageNet 5-way 1-shot · accuracy (higher is better)

9 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 69.132022: 74.63
20192024

tieredImageNet 5-way 5-shot · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 81.752022: 86.06
20192024
YearBest so farSet by
201981.75Meta-Learning With Differentiable Convex Optimization (CVPR 2019 · 1,317 citations)
202286.06How to Train Your MAML to Excel in Few-Shot Classification (ICLR 2022 · 16 citations)

CIFAR-FS 5-way 1-shot · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

4 papers, 2019–2022 · not reported since 2022

2019: 72.82022: 82.02
20192022

CIFAR-FS 5-way 5-shot · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

4 papers, 2019–2022 · not reported since 2022

2019: 852022: 88.25
20192022

Omniglot 20-way 1-shot · accuracy (higher is better)

4 papers, 2019–2022 · not reported since 2022

2019: 97.2
20192022
YearBest so farSet by
201997.2Adaptive Posterior Learning: few-shot learning with a surprise-based memory module (ICLR 2019 · 10 citations)

What has been tried

45 papers here report 490 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 68%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 17%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add adapter network A onlyminiImageNet, Omniglot, and CIFAR-FS, 2-shot · accuracy69.1 -> 72.13; 96.6 -> 97.89; 70.0 -> 75.91HelpedTask-Specific Gradient Adaptation for Few-Shot One-Class Classification (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
add attentive neighbor aggregationNell-One 1-shot · MRR0.311 -> 0.322HelpedMoEMeta: Mixture-of-Experts Meta Learning for Few-Shot Relational Learning (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove dense teachersMeta-Dataset ID Avg · accuracy85.14 -> 85.07HurtUnleashing the Power of Meta-tuning for Few-shot Generalization Through Sparse Interpolated Experts (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Generate both KI and KD rather than only one of themmini-ImageNet 5-way 5-shot · accuracy68.34±0.46% -> 72.02±0.44%HelpedEnabling Few-Shot Learning with PID Control: A Layer Adaptive Optimizer (ICML 2024)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 5 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Omniglot · 2 of 5 papers
  • miniImageNet · 2 of 5 papers
  • CIFAR-FS · 2 of 5 papers

Baselines

  • MAML · 2 of 5 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 11 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 26 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy