AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning

Fine-grained and cross-domain few-shot baselines

Uses baselines, feature reconstruction and prototypical refinement for fine-grained or cross-domain few-shot tasks.

59 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning, keyword cluster “fsl · shot classification · support”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

17 papers in 2023–24 and 11 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 8.3% to 6.2%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 1172018: 5182019: 5192020: 5202021: 5212022: 9222023: 7232024: 10242025: 5252026: 626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CUB 5-way 1-shot · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2019–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2019: 84.82023: 85.44
20192025

CUB 5-way 5-shot · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2019–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2019: 93.092023: 94.73
20192025

miniImageNet 5-way 1-shot · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 52.712019: 58.352020: 63.452023: 68.72
20182025
YearBest so farSet by
201852.71MetaGAN: An Adversarial Approach to Few-Shot Learning (NeurIPS 2018 · 277 citations)
201958.35A Dual Attention Network with Semantic Embedding for Few-Shot Learning (AAAI 2019 · 60 citations)
202063.45Diversity Transfer Network for Few-Shot Learning (AAAI 2020 · 74 citations)
202368.72RankDNN: Learning to Rank for Few-Shot Learning (AAAI 2023 · 28 citations)

miniImageNet 5-way 5-shot · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 68.632019: 71.072020: 77.912023: 85.66
20182025
YearBest so farSet by
201868.63MetaGAN: An Adversarial Approach to Few-Shot Learning (NeurIPS 2018 · 277 citations)
201971.07A Dual Attention Network with Semantic Embedding for Few-Shot Learning (AAAI 2019 · 60 citations)
202077.91Diversity Transfer Network for Few-Shot Learning (AAAI 2020 · 74 citations)
202385.66RankDNN: Learning to Rank for Few-Shot Learning (AAAI 2023 · 28 citations)

What has been tried

51 papers here report 587 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 19%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add CLFR to the baselineCUB (raw images), 1-shot · accuracy (%)54.87 -> 69.81HelpedCross-Layer and Cross-Sample Feature Optimization Network for Few-Shot Fine-Grained Image Classification (AAAI 2024 · 55 citations)
Add MPG to the baselineISIC 1-shot · mIoU44.55 -> 36.67HurtAPSeg: Auto-Prompt Network for Cross-Domain Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation (CVPR 2024 · 34 citations)
use task adaptation before dense comparisonCD-FSS average 1-shot · mIoU+5.86HelpedAdapt Before Comparison: A New Perspective on Cross-Domain Few-Shot Segmentation (CVPR 2024 · 25 citations)
Add BFP to baseline SSP for source training and fine-tune without query labelsDeepglobe · mIoU (%)41.3 -> 44.1HelpedCross-Domain Few-Shot Segmentation via Iterative Support-Query Correspondence Mining (CVPR 2024 · 24 citations)
Add brightness FroFAILSVRC-2012 1-, 5-, and 10-shot · top-1 accuracy+4.8; +1.1; +0.6HelpedFrozen Feature Augmentation for Few-Shot Image Classification (CVPR 2024 · 22 citations)
Replace prototype-aware cross-attention with vanilla cross-attentionCOCO-20i · mIoU (%)31.0 -> 29.4HurtLabel-Efficient Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation with Unsupervised Meta-Training (AAAI 2024 · 16 citations)
Use MVREC features instead of the unaugmented representationMVTec-FS, 1-shot · accuracy+11.3HelpedMVREC: A General Few-shot Defect Classification Model Using Multi-View Region-Context (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)
Add PFRM to the backboneCUB-200-2011, Conv-4 1-shot · accuracy68.87 -> 77.54HelpedFew-Shot Fine-Grained Image Classification with Progressively Feature Refinement and Continuous Relationship Modeling (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
Replace the zero-shot CLIP predictor prior mean with a constant-zero or learnable-vector meanImageNet low-shot classification · accuracyHurtBayesian Exploration of Pre-trained Models for Low-shot Image Classification (CVPR 2024 · 4 citations)
Add auxiliary loss to base-class pre-trainingPASCAL-5^i 1-shot · H-Mean48.58 -> 50.29HelpedEnhancing Generalized Few-Shot Semantic Segmentation via Effective Knowledge Transfer (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
add dynamic bias rectification instead of static bias rectificationMulti-source dataset 1-shot · accuracy35.47±0.25* -> 35.93±1.82*HelpedManhattan Self-Attention Diffusion Residual Networks with Dynamic Bias Rectification for BCI-based Few-Shot Learning (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
Add base-rate adjustment to the evidential modelCifar100 1-shot · ECE0.499±0.004 -> 0.077±0.004HelpedBe Confident in What You Know: Bayesian Parameter Efficient Fine-Tuning of Vision Foundation Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 7 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CUB-200-2011 · 2 of 7 papers

Baselines

  • ProtoNet · 2 of 7 papers
  • FEAT · 2 of 7 papers
  • DeepEMD · 2 of 7 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 28 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy