AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning

Generative feature synthesis for zero-shot

Synthesizes unseen-class features and aligns semantic embeddings to reduce seen-class bias.

117 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Zero-/few-shot and meta-learning, keyword cluster “zero shot · zsl · seen”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

16 papers in 2023–24 and 17 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 7.8% to 9.7%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: aPY (H, last in 2023); AWA1 (H, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 6162017: 8172018: 15182019: 21192020: 13202021: 12212022: 9222023: 7232024: 9242025: 8252026: 926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CUB · H (higher is better)

25 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 73.22021: 73.52023: 77.3
20182025
YearBest so farSet by
201873.2Transductive Unbiased Embedding for Zero-Shot Learning (CVPR 2018 · 233 citations)
202173.5Dual Progressive Prototype Network for Generalized Zero-Shot Learning (NeurIPS 2021 · 22 citations)
202377.3Deconstructed Generation-Based Zero-Shot Model (AAAI 2023 · 6 citations)

AWA2 · H (higher is better)

20 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 77.42020: 89.12023: 90.4
20182025

SUN · H (higher is better)

18 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 41.72020: 52.82022: 75.2
20182025

aPY · H (higher is better)

12 papers, 2018–2023 · not reported since 2023

2018: 22.62019: 56.2
20182023

AWA1 · H (higher is better)

10 papers, 2019–2024 · not reported since 2024

2019: 63.42020: 87.72023: 89.1
20192024

CUB GZSL · H (higher is better)

10 papers, 2018–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2018: 542021: 75.9
20182025
YearBest so farSet by
201854Feature Generating Networks for Zero-Shot Learning (CVPR 2018 · 1,080 citations)
202175.9Hardness Sampling for Self-Training Based Transductive Zero-Shot Learning (CVPR 2021 · 23 citations)

What has been tried

105 papers here report 1,116 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 76%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 15%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add VDKL visual priorCUB · CZSL accuracy84.9 -> 86.8HelpedVisual-Augmented Dynamic Semantic Prototype for Generative Zero-Shot Learning (CVPR 2024 · 39 citations)
Add ID²SD and O²DBDCUB · H54.7 -> 56.5HelpedData Distribution Distilled Generative Model for Generalized Zero-Shot Recognition (AAAI 2024 · 26 citations)
Add FLPT prompt tuning instead of hand-crafted promptsAWA2 · H90.57 -> 93.24HelpedData-Free Generalized Zero-Shot Learning (AAAI 2024 · 18 citations)
Add the attribute prior rather than use no priorUT-Zappos · AUC32.3 -> 33.4HelpedRevealing the Proximate Long-Tail Distribution in Compositional Zero-Shot Learning (AAAI 2024 · 17 citations)
Add the retrieval moduleUT-Zappos closed-world · AUC39.4 -> 40.6HelpedRetrieval-Augmented Primitive Representations for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning (AAAI 2024 · 15 citations)
add diverse semantics from external class names and hierarchy taxonomy enhancementCUB dissimilar · GZSL harmonic mean5.06 -> 47.44HelpedImproving Generalized Zero-Shot Learning by Exploring the Diverse Semantics from External Class Names (CVPR 2024 · 14 citations)
Increase the number of category anchorsNews and review datasets, 5-way 5-shot · accuracyHelpedLiberating Seen Classes: Boosting Few-Shot and Zero-Shot Text Classification via Anchor Generation and Classification Reframing (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)
add Stage I sensor-context training before Stage II18-dataset average · accuracy9.7 -> 45.6HelpedZeroHAR: Sensor Context Augments Zero-Shot Wearable Action Recognition (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
add the GPA module to the backbone-only model (M=8)NUS-Wide ZSL · mAP28.6 -> 32.4HelpedEpsilon: Exploring Comprehensive Visual-Semantic Projection for Multi-Label Zero-Shot Learning (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Add the diffusion discriminatorAWA2, CUB, and SUN · ZSL Top-1 accuracy79.9 -> 82.3; 83.7 -> 84.1; 74.7 -> 75.1HelpedZeroDiff: Solidified Visual-semantic Correlation in Zero-Shot Learning (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)
fine-tune the feature extraction networkAWA2 · H64.7 -> 68.2HelpedClass Semantic Attribute Perception Guided Zero-Shot Learning (AAAI 2025 · 1 citation)
add class diversity promotionCUB GZSL · H55.2 -> 57.4HelpedGenZSL: Generative Zero-Shot Learning Via Inductive Variational Autoencoder (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
TF-VAEGANCUBH56 – 716 papers, e.g. CVPR 2021 and CVPR 2023
TF-VAEGANSUNH40 – 53.73 papers, e.g. CVPR 2021 and CVPR 2023
CE-GZSLCUBH53 – 65.33 papers, e.g. AAAI 2022 and AAAI 2024
TF-VAEGANSUN (GZSL)H43 – 53.72 papers, e.g. AAAI 2024 and CVPR 2021
SynC-structAwA generalized ZSLAUSUC0.533 – 0.5832 papers, e.g. CVPR 2017 and CVPR 2017
E-PGNAWA1H65.3 – 71.22 papers, e.g. AAAI 2021 and ICLR 2021

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • AWA2 · 3 of 8 papers
  • CUB · 3 of 8 papers
  • SUN · 3 of 8 papers

Baselines

  • CLIP · 3 of 8 papers
  • CoOp · 3 of 8 papers
  • CE-GZSL · 2 of 8 papers
  • HSVA · 2 of 8 papers
  • f-VAEGAN · 2 of 8 papers
  • TF-VAEGAN · 2 of 8 papers
  • VADS · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 33 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy