AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Augmentation and mixture-of-experts generalization

Improves open-domain generalization via augmentation, meta-learning and sparse experts.

51 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Domain adaptation and generalization, keyword cluster “domain generalization · dg · unseen”

State History Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

16 papers in 2023–24 and 15 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 4.7% to 4.7%.

Open questions the data points to

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 0182019: 2192020: 4202021: 5212022: 8222023: 12232024: 4242025: 7252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

43 papers here report 509 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 76%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 13%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add prompt-text matched (PTM) supervision to the prompt-learning baselineProtocol 2 average on all sub-protocols · HTER8.11 -> 7.50HelpedCFPL-FAS: Class Free Prompt Learning for Generalizable Face Anti-spoofing (CVPR 2024 · 79 citations)
Add LsemPACS · H-score92.56 -> 99.70HelpedUnknown Prompt the only Lacuna: Unveiling CLIP's Potential for Open Domain Generalization (CVPR 2024 · 17 citations)
Use MS-SSIM instead of L1, L2, or SSIM for the frontalization lossCross-dataset gaze estimation · angular error (degrees)L1 7.28, 7.40, 6.76, 7.47; L2 7.12, 8.25, 7.18, 8.19; SSIM 6.78, 8.59, 6.33, 7.56; MS-SSIM 5.72, 6.97, 7.18, 7.38MixedGaze from Origin: Learning for Generalized Gaze Estimation by Embedding the Gaze Frontalization Process (AAAI 2024 · 8 citations)
add reconstruction moduleLibriSeVoc seen vocoders · EER (%)20.21 -> 19.16MixedImproving Generalization for AI-Synthesized Voice Detection (AAAI 2025 · 7 citations)
Use the gaze-target rotation and translation alignment function rather than offset, linear, affine, or homography mappingsMPIIFaceGaze + EyeDiap average · angular error (°)6.95, 6.87, 6.81, 6.80 -> 6.76HelpedGaze Label Alignment: Alleviating Domain Shift for Gaze Estimation (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
add State Style Randomization (SSR)PACS · average accuracy89.4 -> 90.4; 1.0%HelpedDGFamba: Learning Flow Factorized State Space for Visual Domain Generalization (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
Add a domain-specific prompt to the domain-invariant promptCamelyon17 · A-Acc85.94 -> 86.24HelpedMemory-Efficient Prompt Tuning for Incremental Histopathology Classification (AAAI 2024 · 3 citations)
add the dual-branch adapterSDGOD Avg. · mAP59.8 -> 60.7HelpedTowards Single-Source Domain Generalized Object Detection via Causal Visual Prompts (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
Add Robust-PT initializationRobust UDA tasks across perturbation budgets · accuracyHelpedTAROT: Towards Essentially Domain-Invariant Robustness with Theoretical Justification (CVPR 2025 · 1 citation)
Train on a subset of queried test-domain classes rather than excluding the test domainClipart and Sketch · balanced top-1 accuracyClipart: 27.4 -> 17.1; Sketch: 30.1 -> 19.2HurtWhen and How Does CLIP Enable Domain and Compositional Generalization? (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
add original PatchMixDomainNet Real+Painting, Painting · ACC All34.5 -> 34.8HelpedHiLo: A Learning Framework for Generalized Category Discovery Robust to Domain Shifts (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
BaselineGaze360→EyeDiapangular error9 – 11.422 papers, e.g. AAAI 2023 and AAAI 2022
BaselineGaze360→MPIIGazeangular error8.18 – 9.892 papers, e.g. AAAI 2023 and AAAI 2022
BaselineETH-XGaze→EyeDiapangular error7.74 – 8.522 papers, e.g. AAAI 2022 and AAAI 2023
BaselineETH-XGaze→MPIIGazeangular error8.13 – 8.82 papers, e.g. AAAI 2022 and AAAI 2023

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • DomainNet · 3 of 8 papers
  • OfficeHome · 2 of 8 papers
  • ImageNet · 2 of 8 papers
  • ImageNet-Sketch · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 31 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy