AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Adversarial domain adaptation

Uses domain-adversarial learning with theory, symmetric networks and cluster assumptions.

95 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Domain adaptation and generalization, keyword cluster “domain adaptation · unsupervised domain · uda”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 1 of 6 tracked benchmarks.

8 papers in 2023–24 and 6 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 2.3% to 1.9%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: SVHN → MNIST (accuracy, last in 2019); Office-31 (Avg) (accuracy, last in 2020); MNIST → SVHN (accuracy, last in 2020); MNIST → USPS (accuracy, last in 2020); Office-Home (accuracy, last in 2023).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 7172018: 20182019: 22192020: 19202021: 5212022: 6222023: 7232024: 1242025: 3252026: 326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

SVHN → MNIST · accuracy (higher is better)

10 papers, 2017–2019 · not reported since 2019

2017: 87.22018: 99.4
20172019
YearBest so farSet by
201787.2Few-Shot Adversarial Domain Adaptation (NeurIPS 2017 · 205 citations)
201899.4A DIRT-T Approach to Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (ICLR 2018 · 431 citations)

Office-31 (Avg) · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2016–2020 · not reported since 2020

2016: 73.72019: 89.5
20162020

Office-Home avg · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2019–2025 · still improving

2019: 67.62020: 70.52025: 77.3
20192025
YearBest so farSet by
201967.6Domain-Symmetric Networks for Adversarial Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2019 · 341 citations)
202070.5Domain Conditioned Adaptation Network (AAAI 2020 · 107 citations)
202577.3A General Representation-Based Approach to Multi-Source Domain Adaptation (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)

MNIST → SVHN · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2017–2020 · not reported since 2020

2017: 472018: 76.52019: 87.48
20172020
YearBest so farSet by
201747Few-Shot Adversarial Domain Adaptation (NeurIPS 2017 · 205 citations)
201876.5A DIRT-T Approach to Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (ICLR 2018 · 431 citations)
201987.48Gotta Adapt 'Em All: Joint Pixel and Feature-Level Domain Adaptation for Recognition in the Wild (CVPR 2019 · 48 citations)

MNIST → USPS · accuracy (higher is better)

7 papers, 2017–2020 · not reported since 2020

2017: 94.42018: 97.62019: 99.3
20172020
YearBest so farSet by
201794.4Few-Shot Adversarial Domain Adaptation (NeurIPS 2017 · 205 citations)
201897.6From Source to Target and Back: Symmetric Bi-Directional Adaptive GAN (CVPR 2018 · 252 citations)
201999.3Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Using Feature-Whitening and Consensus Loss (CVPR 2019 · 172 citations)

Office-Home · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2019–2023 · not reported since 2023

2019: 68.12020: 70.92022: 71.8
20192023

What has been tried

88 papers here report 900 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 76%, no clear effect 5%, hurt 16%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add CNN-to-ViT pseudo-label teaching to ViT-to-CNN teachingDomainNet SSDA mean, 3-shot · accuracy79.4 -> 85.5HelpedLearning CNN on ViT: A Hybrid Model to Explicitly Class-specific Boundaries for Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2024 · 44 citations)
add a separation stage before adaptationC→D · OS64.3 -> 69.2HelpedOpen-Set Cross-Network Node Classification via Unknown-Excluded Adversarial Graph Domain Alignment (AAAI 2025 · 5 citations)
add VAE-related lossesOffice-Home Avg · accuracy75.9 -> 77.3HelpedA General Representation-Based Approach to Multi-Source Domain Adaptation (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
DANOffice-31 Avgaccuracy71.7 – 78.52 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2016 and AAAI 2019
DANNOffice-31 A→Waccuracy79.3 – 85.972 papers, e.g. CVPR 2018 and CVPR 2019
DANNVisDAaccuracy57.4 – 61.882 papers, e.g. CVPR 2018 and NeurIPS 2020

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 5 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Office-Home · 2 of 5 papers

Baselines

  • DANN · 2 of 5 papers
  • MCD · 2 of 5 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 27 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy