AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Conditional distribution alignment

Aligns conditional or disentangled distributions for domain adaptation, including universal and generalized shift.

162 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Domain adaptation and generalization, keyword cluster “domain adaptation · unsupervised domain · uda”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports The tracked benchmarks have at most one report from 2025–26 that could beat the old record, too few to say whether they are still moving.

31 papers in 2023–24 and 35 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 9.1% to 11.0%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: SVHN→MNIST (accuracy, last in 2020); MNIST→USPS (accuracy, last in 2020); Office-Home Avg. (accuracy, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 5162017: 10172018: 10182019: 14192020: 24202021: 18212022: 15222023: 15232024: 16242025: 18252026: 1726

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

Office-Home · accuracy (higher is better)

9 papers, 2020–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2020: 712022: 76.192024: 80.1
20202025

SVHN→MNIST · accuracy (higher is better)

8 papers, 2017–2020 · not reported since 2020

2017: 852018: 99.262019: 99.32020: 99.4
20172020

Office-31 · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

6 papers, 2020–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2020: 89.62024: 92.7
20202025

DomainNet · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2021–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2021: 51.32024: 82
20212025

MNIST→USPS · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2018–2020 · not reported since 2020

2018: 99.54
20182020
YearBest so farSet by
201899.54Self-ensembling for visual domain adaptation (ICLR 2018 · 60 citations)

Office-Home Avg. · accuracy (higher is better)

5 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 72.32022: 72.72024: 77.1
20202024

What has been tried

136 papers here report 1,400 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 74%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 17%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add GAL to HiGDA-T with S+T trainingOffice-Home 3-shot · accuracy5.3%HelpedHiGDA: Hierarchical Graph of Nodes to Learn Local-to-Global Topology for Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2025 · 33 citations)
Add intra-domain weights to ATENDomainNet Avg. (three-task ablation table) · accuracy59.5 -> 60.1HelpedAgile Multi-Source-Free Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2024 · 18 citations)
Add Lpsd to LclsOffice-Home · accuracy72.4 -> 78.8HelpedCycle Self-Refinement for Multi-Source Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2024 · 18 citations)
Add neighborhood invariance learning (NIL)Office ODA · H-score17.1 -> 92.8HelpedMLNet: Mutual Learning Network with Neighborhood Invariance for Universal Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2024 · 18 citations)
add domain separationVisDA · accuracy84.3 -> 86.4HelpedA Separation and Alignment Framework for Black-Box Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2024 · 10 citations)
add supervision using reliable known knowledgeOffice-31 (Avg) · HOS80.3 -> 79.7HurtUnveiling the Unknown: Unleashing the Power of Unknown to Known in Open-Set Source-Free Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2024 · 8 citations)
Add exemplar replay loss LrepOffice-31-CI · accuracy79.8 -> 88.4HelpedMulti-Granularity Class Prototype Topology Distillation for Class-Incremental Source-Free Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2025 · 7 citations)
Use target refinement with τ=0.8 instead of τ=1.0, retaining the closest samplesOffice-31, 40% label corruption · average accuracy83.3 -> 83.6HelpedConfusing Pair Correction Based on Category Prototype for Domain Adaptation under Noisy Environments (AAAI 2024 · 7 citations)
Add LK to the configuration with no listed componentsOffice-Home · accuracy57.6 -> 73.7HelpedLow Category Uncertainty and High Training Potential Instance Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2024 · 6 citations)
add selection trainingOffice-31 · accuracy89.2 -> 87.7HelpedReviewing the Forgotten Classes for Domain Adaptation of Black-Box Predictors (AAAI 2024 · 5 citations)
replace weight barcode estimation with JPOT-based mean transport costOffice-31 (Avg) · OS accuracy (%)94.9 -> 96.4HurtDistinguish Then Exploit: Source-free Open Set Domain Adaptation via Weight Barcode Estimation and Sparse Label Assignment (CVPR 2025 · 4 citations)
Add MOD to CE-only trainingAVE · accuracy (Image)49.90 -> 53.22HelpedMODfinity: Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Multimodal Information Flow Intertwining (CVPR 2025 · 4 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
Source OnlyMNIST→SVHNaccuracy (%)40.2 – 47.82 papers, e.g. AAAI 2019 and AAAI 2020
SymNetsOffice-31-DAaccuracy74.6 – 88.42 papers, e.g. AAAI 2020 and CVPR 2020

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 23 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Office-Home · 6 of 23 papers
  • DomainNet · 3 of 23 papers
  • Office-31 · 3 of 23 papers
  • VisDA2017 · 2 of 23 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 23 papers
  • USPS · 2 of 23 papers
  • SVHN · 2 of 23 papers

Baselines

  • DANN · 5 of 23 papers
  • PGL · 3 of 23 papers
  • OSBP · 2 of 23 papers
  • ANNA · 2 of 23 papers
  • DeepJDOT · 2 of 23 papers
  • SHOT · 2 of 23 papers
  • Source-only · 2 of 23 papers
  • GCN · 2 of 23 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 66 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy