AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Domain adaptation and generalization

Feature alignment for unsupervised adaptation

Progressively and dynamically aligns source and target features with analysis of limits.

105 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Domain adaptation and generalization, keyword cluster “domain adaptation · unsupervised domain · uda”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Still moving The best reported result is still improving on 2 of 6 tracked benchmarks.

27 papers in 2023–24 and 20 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.9% to 6.3%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: Office-31 W→A (accuracy (%), last in 2021); GTA5 → Cityscapes (mIoU, last in 2024); MNIST→USPS (accuracy (%), last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 0172018: 3182019: 7192020: 9202021: 22212022: 16222023: 13232024: 14242025: 12252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

Office-31 Avg · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2019–2025 · still improving

2019: 90.22020: 90.82025: 93.5
20192025

Office-Home (Avg.) · accuracy (higher is better)

6 papers, 2019–2025 · still improving

2019: 74.12021: 75.52025: 76.7
20192025

Office-31 W→A · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

5 papers, 2019–2021 · not reported since 2021

2019: 71.152021: 72.5
20192021

GTA5 → Cityscapes · mIoU (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 43.62021: 48.12022: 49.2
20202024

MNIST→USPS · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

4 papers, 2019–2022 · not reported since 2022

2019: 952020: 97.8
20192022
YearBest so farSet by
201995Progressive Feature Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2019 · 482 citations)
202097.8Stochastic Classifiers for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2020 · 185 citations)

Office-31 · accuracy (%) (higher is better)

4 papers, 2021–2025 · one report since 2024, not better

2021: 92.44
20212025
YearBest so farSet by
202192.44Sample Selection for Universal Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2021 · 17 citations)

What has been tried

95 papers here report 1,043 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 78%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 15%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add the L_x source-classification lossOffice-Home · accuracy+2.1HelpedPrompt-Based Distribution Alignment for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2024 · 76 citations)
Add visual prompting onlyOffice-Home · accuracy75.3 -> 75.7HelpedDomain-Agnostic Mutual Prompting for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2024 · 44 citations)
add feature decomposition regularization LregOffice-31, Office-Home, and VisDA OPDA · H-score (%)82.0 -> 84.5; 73.6 -> 74.5; 61.5 -> 67.3HelpedLEAD: Learning Decomposition for Source-free Universal Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2024 · 34 citations)
transfer source-domain knowledgeOffice-Home A→R · mAP4.51 -> 71.18HelpedEffective Comparative Prototype Hashing for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2024 · 27 citations)
add discriminator Mixup to PL-MixAmazon Reviews 12-task average · accuracy93.41 -> 93.84HelpedOn Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: Pseudo Label Guided Mixup for Adversarial Prompt Tuning (AAAI 2024 · 9 citations)
replace CLIP zero-shot hard-label guidance with source-enhanced pseudo-labelsOffice-Home target Ar · accuracy47.6 -> 75.8HelpedPreserving Clusters in Prompt Learning for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2025 · 7 citations)
Remove LpseOffice-31 OSDA · HOS91.4 -> 87.3HurtDynamic Target Distribution Estimation for Source-Free Open-Set Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2025 · 6 citations)
Add group reweighted pseudo-label refinementopen-set · accuracy50.4 -> 56.8HelpedUniversal Semi-Supervised Domain Adaptation by Mitigating Common-Class Bias (CVPR 2024 · 6 citations)
add collaborative self-training to source-only trainingDaily-DA, A→H · accuracy (%)49.6 -> 60.8HelpedUnsupervised Video Domain Adaptation with Masked Pre-Training and Collaborative Self-Training (CVPR 2024 · 6 citations)
Train prompts using target pseudo-label loss only instead of zero-shot CLIPImageCLEF · accuracy88.1 -> 90.1HelpedEnhancing Domain Adaptation through Prompt Gradient Alignment (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Add prototypical contrastive learning (LPC)Office-Home (Avg.) · accuracy30.45 -> 37.13HelpedLink-based Contrastive Learning for One-Shot Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (CVPR 2025 · 4 citations)
add TASC loss and UniMS to CE trainingOffice OPDA · H-score82.9 -> 91.3HelpedTarget Semantics Clustering via Text Representations for Robust Universal Domain Adaptation (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
GLCVisDA OSDAH-score (%)72.5 – 81.62 papers, e.g. CVPR 2024 and ICLR 2024
GLCOffice-Home OSDAH-score (%)69.8 – 76.22 papers, e.g. CVPR 2024 and ICLR 2024
Baseline-BDomainNetaverage accuracy36.2 – 38.52 papers, e.g. ICLR 2022 and CVPR 2022

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 12 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Office-Home · 9 of 12 papers
  • DomainNet · 8 of 12 papers
  • Office-31 · 5 of 12 papers
  • VisDA · 5 of 12 papers
  • VisDA-2017 · 4 of 12 papers
  • Office · 2 of 12 papers
  • PACS · 2 of 12 papers

Baselines

  • DANN · 5 of 12 papers
  • CDAN · 4 of 12 papers
  • UAN · 3 of 12 papers
  • CMU · 3 of 12 papers
  • DCC · 3 of 12 papers
  • OVANet · 3 of 12 papers
  • DANCE · 3 of 12 papers
  • SHOT · 3 of 12 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 47 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy