AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

Scene graph generation

Generate scene graphs with unbiased relation learning and transformers.

70 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Knowledge and temporal graphs, keyword cluster “scene · image · visual”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

17 papers in 2023–24 and 18 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 6.6% to 6.4%.

No longer reported by papers here: Visual Genome PredCls (mR@100, last in 2023); Visual Genome SGCls (mR@100, last in 2023); Visual Genome SGDet (mR@100, last in 2023); Visual Genome PredCls (mR@50, last in 2022); Visual Genome PredCls (R@100, last in 2022); Visual Genome SGCls (R@100, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 1172018: 5182019: 4192020: 6202021: 6212022: 12222023: 9232024: 8242025: 6252026: 1226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

Visual Genome PredCls · mR@100 (higher is better)

9 papers, 2020–2023 · not reported since 2023

2020: 29.12021: 32.92022: 40.3
20202023

Visual Genome SGCls · mR@100 (higher is better)

9 papers, 2020–2023 · not reported since 2023

2020: 14.92021: 20.452022: 27.6
20202023
YearBest so farSet by
202014.9Unbiased Scene Graph Generation From Biased Training (CVPR 2020 · 755 citations)
202120.45Energy-Based Learning for Scene Graph Generation (CVPR 2021 · 157 citations)
202227.6Fine-Grained Predicates Learning for Scene Graph Generation (CVPR 2022 · 52 citations)

Visual Genome SGDet · mR@100 (higher is better)

7 papers, 2020–2023 · not reported since 2023

2020: 11.12021: 11.62022: 20.3
20202023
YearBest so farSet by
202011.1Unbiased Scene Graph Generation From Biased Training (CVPR 2020 · 755 citations)
202111.6Energy-Based Learning for Scene Graph Generation (CVPR 2021 · 157 citations)
202220.3Fine-Grained Predicates Learning for Scene Graph Generation (CVPR 2022 · 52 citations)

Visual Genome PredCls · mR@50 (higher is better)

6 papers, 2021–2022 · not reported since 2022

2021: 30.42022: 36.4
20212022

Visual Genome PredCls · R@100 (higher is better)

5 papers, 2017–2022 · not reported since 2022

2017: 53.082018: 67.12021: 71.7
20172022
YearBest so farSet by
201753.08Scene Graph Generation by Iterative Message Passing (CVPR 2017 · 1,254 citations)
201867.1Neural Motifs: Scene Graph Parsing With Global Context (CVPR 2018 · 1,124 citations)
202171.7Joint Modeling of Visual Objects and Relations for Scene Graph Generation (NeurIPS 2021 · 5 citations)

Visual Genome SGCls · R@100 (higher is better)

5 papers, 2017–2022 · not reported since 2022

2017: 24.382018: 36.52021: 44.2
20172022
YearBest so farSet by
201724.38Scene Graph Generation by Iterative Message Passing (CVPR 2017 · 1,254 citations)
201836.5Neural Motifs: Scene Graph Parsing With Global Context (CVPR 2018 · 1,124 citations)
202144.2Joint Modeling of Visual Objects and Relations for Scene Graph Generation (NeurIPS 2021 · 5 citations)

What has been tried

56 papers here report 599 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 71%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 21%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add indistinguishable triplet transferPSG SGDet · mR@10022.1 -> 29.2HelpedPanoptic Scene Graph Generation with Semantics-Prototype Learning (AAAI 2024 · 29 citations)
Add adaptive refinement without hierarchical predictionVisual Genome, PredCls · mR@100 UC/C66.3 / 39.2 -> 67.1 / 39.8HelpedHiKER-SGG: Hierarchical Knowledge Enhanced Robust Scene Graph Generation (CVPR 2024 · 21 citations)
Add relation rescoringVisual Genome test, SGDet · R@506.9 -> 25.9HelpedDSGG: Dense Relation Transformer for an End-to-end Scene Graph Generation (CVPR 2024 · 14 citations)
add event streamsDSEC-Detection · mAP0.266 -> 0.284HelpedAsynchronous Collaborative Graph Representation for Frames and Events (CVPR 2025 · 5 citations)
Replace KWGNN with GNNVG SGDET · Recall@10039.3 -> 30.2HurtKumaraswamy Wavelet for Heterophilic Scene Graph Generation (AAAI 2024 · 4 citations)
Add MLLM-based plausibility post-processing to conformal triplet setsVG150 SGDET · AvgSize (triplet set)roughly halves set size (e.g., BGNN 971.69 to 464.11)HelpedConformal Prediction and MLLM aided Uncertainty Quantification in Scene Graph Generation (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
Remove EMA and use fixed class-specific thresholdsVisual Genome SGCls · mR@50 / 10016.9 / 18.0 -> 6.0 / 7.7HurtAdaptive Self-training Framework for Fine-grained Scene Graph Generation (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
remove the context checker and randomly combine triplet labels in promptsS1 and S2 · evaluation metricsapproximately 2% decreaseHurtAdaptive Visual Scene Understanding: Incremental Scene Graph Generation (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)
Add learnable parameters to TF-l-IDFVisual Genome PredCls · mR@5031.6 -> 33.6HelpedScene Graph Generation Strategy with Co-occurrence Knowledge and Learnable Term Frequency (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Add image-scene alignment loss during denoisingCOCO-Stuff and Visual Genome · FID and ISHelpedScene Graph-Grounded Image Generation (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Add geometric spatial proximity matrix to lane aggregationOpenLane-V2 subsetA · TOPll21.6 -> 24.1HelpedT2SG: Traffic Topology Scene Graph for Topology Reasoning in Autonomous Driving (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
add Hybrid Relation AssignmentVG150 test · mR@5012.9 -> 14.9HelpedHydra-SGG: Hybrid Relation Assignment for One-stage Scene Graph Generation (ICLR 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 8 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Visual Genome · 2 of 8 papers
  • Action Genome · 2 of 8 papers

Baselines

  • MOTIFS · 2 of 8 papers
  • BGNN · 2 of 8 papers
  • EGTR · 2 of 8 papers
  • STTran · 2 of 8 papers
  • DSGDetr · 2 of 8 papers
  • TEMPURA · 2 of 8 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 35 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy