AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

Knowledge graph embeddings

Embed entities and relations with geometric transformations for link prediction.

110 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Knowledge and temporal graphs, keyword cluster “knowledge graph · entities · kg”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

20 papers in 2023–24 and 13 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.8% to 4.6%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: FB15k-237 (MRR, last in 2024); WN18RR (MRR, last in 2024); YAGO3-10 (MRR, last in 2024); FB15K (MRR, last in 2022); WN18 (MRR, last in 2022); FB15k-237 (Hits@10, last in 2022).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 6172018: 10182019: 18192020: 16202021: 13212022: 10222023: 10232024: 10242025: 4252026: 926

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

FB15k-237 · MRR (higher is better)

24 papers, 2018–2024 · not reported since 2024

2018: 0.3252019: 0.4042021: 0.4152024: 0.52
20182024

WN18RR · MRR (higher is better)

23 papers, 2018–2024 · not reported since 2024

2018: 0.432019: 0.4882020: 0.4972021: 0.52022: 0.5112024: 0.525
20182024
YearBest so farSet by
20180.43Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddings (AAAI 2018 · 2,484 citations)
20190.488Quaternion Knowledge Graph Embeddings (NeurIPS 2019 · 281 citations)
20200.497Learning Hierarchy-Aware Knowledge Graph Embeddings for Link Prediction (AAAI 2020 · 413 citations)
20210.55* Knowledge Graph Embeddings with Projective Transformations (AAAI 2021 · 30 citations)
20220.511HousE: Knowledge Graph Embedding with Householder Parameterization (ICML 2022 · 20 citations)
20240.525Generalizing Knowledge Graph Embedding with Universal Orthogonal Parameterization (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)

YAGO3-10 · MRR (higher is better)

14 papers, 2018–2024 · not reported since 2024

2018: 0.442019: 0.4952020: 0.5452022: 0.5792024: 0.588
20182024

FB15K · MRR (higher is better)

8 papers, 2018–2022 · not reported since 2022

2018: 0.6572019: 0.8332021: 0.84
20182022
YearBest so farSet by
20180.657Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddings (AAAI 2018 · 2,484 citations)
20190.833Quaternion Knowledge Graph Embeddings (NeurIPS 2019 · 281 citations)
20210.845* Knowledge Graph Embeddings with Projective Transformations (AAAI 2021 · 30 citations)

WN18 · MRR (higher is better)

7 papers, 2018–2022 · not reported since 2022

2018: 0.9432019: 0.952021: 0.96
20182022
YearBest so farSet by
20180.943Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddings (AAAI 2018 · 2,484 citations)
20190.95Quaternion Knowledge Graph Embeddings (NeurIPS 2019 · 281 citations)
20210.965* Knowledge Graph Embeddings with Projective Transformations (AAAI 2021 · 30 citations)

FB15k-237 · Hits@10 (higher is better)

5 papers, 2018–2022 · not reported since 2022

2018: 0.4912019: 0.542020: 0.576
20182022

What has been tried

99 papers here report 968 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 19%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add GRot grid embeddingPorto · HR@10.3243 -> 0.5244HelpedKGTS: Contrastive Trajectory Similarity Learning over Prompt Knowledge Graph Embedding (AAAI 2024 · 26 citations)
Add context to R-GCN link predictionDocRED · Hits@10.06 -> 0.11HelpedRevisiting Document-Level Relation Extraction with Context-Guided Link Prediction (AAAI 2024 · 15 citations)
add the Scoring ModuleFB15k-237 · MRR0.449 -> 0.520HelpedKGDM: A Diffusion Model to Capture Multiple Relation Semantics for Knowledge Graph Embedding (AAAI 2024 · 11 citations)
add entity retrievalMedicine · F135.4 -> 29.8HelpedHyperGraphRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Hypergraph-Structured Knowledge Representation (NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations)
Use relational clustering-based anchor selection instead of random selectionFB15k-237 entity prediction · MRR0.249 -> 0.265HelpedClustering then Propagation: Select Better Anchors for Knowledge Graph Embedding (NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations)
remove retriever (random relevant descriptions) from DRKAFB15K link prediction, Overall · Hits@1054.8 -> 51.5HurtSelect and Augment: Enhanced Dense Retrieval Knowledge Graph Augmentation (Abstract Reprint) (AAAI 2024 · 1 citation)
Remove the adaptive dangling indicator r_eiDBP2.0 entity alignment · alignment performanceHurtLambda: Learning Matchable Prior For Entity Alignment with Unlabeled Dangling Cases (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Use MAYPL's structure-driven initializer rather than learnable vectors for each entity and relationWikiPeople´ · MRR0.388 -> 0.521HelpedStructure Is All You Need: Structural Representation Learning on Hyper-Relational Knowledge Graphs (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace Euclidean geometry with elliptic geometryWN18RR · MRR.496 -> .505HelpedGeneralizing Knowledge Graph Embedding with Universal Orthogonal Parameterization (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
use mean aggregator instead of sum aggregator in RAMP encoderFB15K-237, CoDEx, UMLS · generalization errorHelpedPAC-Bayesian Generalization Bounds for Knowledge Graph Representation Learning (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Replace late interaction with early interactionAIDS and NCI · MAP0.557 → 0.726; 0.529 → 0.624HelpedCharting the Design Space of Neural Graph Representations for Subgraph Matching (ICLR 2025)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
RotatEWN18RRMRR0.411 – 0.4767 papers, e.g. AAAI 2023 and ICLR 2022
RotatEFB15k-237MRR0.296 – 0.3387 papers, e.g. AAAI 2023 and ICLR 2022
RotatEYAGO3-10MRR0.121 – 0.4953 papers, e.g. AAAI 2023 and AAAI 2020
ComplExWN18RRMRR0.44 – 0.493 papers, e.g. ICLR 2019 and AAAI 2021
ConvENELL-995MRR49.1 – 75.422 papers, e.g. AAAI 2021 and AAAI 2020
RESCALFB15K testHITS@10 (%)44.1 – 59.62 papers, e.g. NeurIPS 2018 and AAAI 2018

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 5 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Baselines

  • DistMult · 2 of 5 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 33 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy