atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

Adaptive Visual Scene Understanding: Incremental Scene Graph Generation

NeurIPS 2024 · Graph learning › Knowledge and temporal graphs · approach: Scene graph generation · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces a continual scene graph generation (CSEGG) benchmark with three learning regimes on Visual Genome and RAS, a generative replay method that synthesizes replay images from recomposed triplet labels using Stable Diffusion instead of storing images.

Problem

Scene graph generation models must continually learn new objects and relationships without forgetting old ones, a setting that existing continual learning work for classification and detection does not address, and long-tailed distributions and combinatorial relation complexity make it harder.

Approach

Replay via analysis by synthesis: store only triplet labels and the previous model snapshot, recompose triplets into context-coherent text prompts (BERT embeddings plus agglomerative clustering), synthesize replay images with Stable Diffusion, pseudo-label them with the frozen old SGG model, and apply triplet-level long-tailed sampling.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use RAS instead of Replay@10% and NaiveSGTR-based CSEGG methods · S3 unknown-object generalization test setGen RHelped
use RAS instead of Replay@10% and NaiveSGTR-based CSEGG methods · S3 unknown-object generalization test setGen R_bboxHurt
use Replay@10% instead of NaiveSGTR-based CSEGG methods · S3 unknown-object generalization test setGen RHelped
use Replay@10% instead of NaiveSGTR-based CSEGG methods · S3 unknown-object generalization test setGen R_bboxHurt
remove the context checker and randomly combine triplet labels in prompts (ablation)RAS · S1 and S2evaluation metrics: approximately 2% decreaseHurt
remove LTD sampling from replay triplets (ablation)RAS · S1 and S2evaluation metrics: absolute decrease of 1-2%Hurt
replace multiple triplet labels per prompt with a single triplet label (ablation)RAS · S1 and S2evaluation metrics: approximately 3% decreaseHurt
increase the number of generated images per prompt (γ varied from 2 to 8) (ablation)RAS · S1 and S2evaluation metricsHelped
fine-tune DETR over S1 tasksSGTR-based CSEGG methods · Visual Genome test setmAP: a slight decrease of 0.4No clear effect
apply BLS@Replay@10% instead of LVIS@Replay@10%Replay-based CSEGG methods · S1performanceHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Visual Genome

Benchmarks: CSEGG benchmark (Visual Genome-based)

Metrics: R@K mR@K Forgetfulness (F@K) Avg.R@K FWT@K BWT@K Gen R_bbox@K Gen R@K

Baselines: Naive EWC PackNet Replay@10% Replay@20% Replay@100% Joint Training RAS_GT LVIS BLS

Builds on: SGTR Replay EWC PackNet Stable Diffusion

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy