atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Knowledge and temporal graphs

Asynchronous Collaborative Graph Representation for Frames and Events

CVPR 2025 · Graph learning › Knowledge and temporal graphs · approach: Scene graph generation · 5 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ACGR, a unified graph representation that fuses asynchronous frames and events via offset-based alignment and adversarial domain adaptation, enabling object detection and depth estimation up to 200 Hz.

Problem

Frame-event fusion methods convert events into image-like tensors synchronized with frames, limiting inference to the frame rate, use costly two-branch backbones, and fail to exploit the sparse spatiotemporal structure of events.

Approach

Build sparse unimodal graphs for frames and events, connect them with an offset-estimated cross-modal edge set into one unified graph processed by spline GCNs, and align frame and event feature spaces with adversarial domain adaptation (discarded at inference).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add frame and event graph representation using ACGRSODFormer · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.281 -> 0.317Helped
add frame and event graph representation using ACGRYOLOX · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.266 -> 0.313Helped
add ACGR to LitemonoLitemono · MVSEC outdoor day1Abs.Rel.: 0.305 -> 0.256Helped
add event streams (ablation)YOLOX frame-only baseline · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.266 -> 0.284Helped
add ACAM for asynchronous frame-event alignment (ablation)YOLOX with event streams · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.284 -> 0.291Helped
add domain alignment loss Ld (ablation)YOLOX with events and ACAM · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.291 -> 0.313Helped
replace ACGR with frame and event image representations (ablation)SODFormer · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.317 -> 0.281Hurt
replace ACGR with frame and voxel grid representations (ablation)SODFormer · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.317 -> 0.279Hurt
replace ACGR with frame and voxel graph representations (ablation)SODFormer · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.317 -> 0.284Hurt
vary node-filtering threshold θ (ablation)ACGR with DAGr · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.167 (θ=0); 0.282 (θ=1); 0.284 (θ=2); 0.261 (θ=4); 0.259 (θ=8)Mixed
use asynchronous inference with events at 50ms latency (ablation)ACGR with DAGr · DSEC-DetectionmAP: 0.284 -> 0.283No clear effect
increase event-node filtering threshold from θ=0 to θ=2 (ablation)ACGR with DAGr · DSEC-DetectionRuntime (ms): 44.5 -> 9.1Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DSEC-Detection MVSEC

Benchmarks: DSEC-Detection MVSEC

Metrics: mAP mAP50 Abs.Rel. RMS RMSlog Params Runtime

Baselines: Faster R-CNN YOLOX Swin Transformer Deformable DETR EMS-YOLO AsyNet AEGNN ASTM-Net FPN-fusion SFNet DAGr SODFormer

Builds on: DAGr YOLOX SODFormer Lite-Mono deformable convolution gradient reversal layer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy