AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Bandits and online learning / Online convex optimization and games

Online decision-making with feedback structure

Analyze online prediction under delayed, bandit, strategic, or dynamical feedback.

81 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Online convex optimization and games, keyword cluster “price · pricing · auctions”

State History Tried Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

24 papers in 2023–24 and 27 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 10.5% to 9.8%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 2162017: 1172018: 3182019: 4192020: 10202021: 6212022: 4222023: 12232024: 12242025: 14252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

62 papers here report 396 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 20%, mixed 8%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
increase re-solving frequencyInput I and Input II, T from 10^3 to 10^6 · regretHelpedWait-Less Offline Tuning and Re-solving for Online Decision Making (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Replace no exploration (M0) with M2's exploration and learning restartT=105 · regret123.03 -> 24.00HelpedDecoupling Learning and Decision-Making: Breaking the $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{T})$ Barrier in Online Resource Allocation with First-Order Methods (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
epsilon-Greedy exploration parameter m below 500 (m=30 to 400)5-arm toy bandit · mean regretHurtIncentivized Learning in Principal-Agent Bandit Games (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
Add a tightness parameter in the dual updateConstrained causal logistic bandits · cumulative constraint violationseO(nS√T + n²S²κZ + (1 + ϵ)²√T − ϵT) -> 0HelpedCausal Logistic Bandits with Counterfactual Fairness Constraints (ICML 2025)

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 51 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy