AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Attention and transformers

Sparse and structured attention

Redesigns self-attention with sparsity, structure, and rank analysis for efficiency and interpretability.

163 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Attention and transformers, keyword cluster “kv · cache · long context”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

26 papers in 2023–24 and 65 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 4.5% to 5.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 3172018: 6182019: 9192020: 19202021: 19212022: 13222023: 13232024: 13242025: 19252026: 4626

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

104 papers here report 1,145 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 70%, no clear effect 8%, hurt 19%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
remove attentive inductive bias and use only self-attentionBeauty, Sports, Toys, Yelp, LastFM, ML-1M · HR@20Beauty: 0.1373 -> 0.1265; Sports: 0.0858 -> 0.0779HurtAn Attentive Inductive Bias for Sequential Recommendation beyond the Self-Attention (AAAI 2024 · 124 citations)
Add residual self-attentionYFCC100M and ScanNet · AUC@20°82.00 -> 82.15; 57.16 -> 57.97HelpedResMatch: Residual Attention Learning for Feature Matching (AAAI 2024 · 13 citations)
Restrict attention to positional information rather than semantic informationHistogram task test set · accuracy0.99885 ± 0.0004; 0.99895 ± 0.0012No clear effectA Phase Transition between Positional and Semantic Learning in a Solvable Model of Dot-Product Attention (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Add λ₂ weighting to attention-head averagingImageNet Segmentation · Acc84.00 -> 84.12HelpedAttention (as Discrete-Time Markov) Chains (NeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations)
use continuous linear attention instead of the discrete mixerRadial kernel learning OOD1 · operator test error25.81% -> 8.10%HelpedNonlocal Attention Operator: Materializing Hidden Knowledge Towards Interpretable Physics Discovery (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
replace Rotary with another positional embeddingPile-CC validation · Sink₁ᵋ (%)Rotary 18.18; NoPE 20.35; Absolute PE 32.73; Learnable PE 33.13; Relative PE 35.53; ALiBi 20.78No clear effectWhen Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical View (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)
Reduce the prediction block size b_QImage completion and meta-regression · log-likelihoodHelpedMemory Efficient Neural Processes via Constant Memory Attention Block (ICML 2024 · 1 citation)
Increase PAP iterations from 4 to 6 at the first layerImageNet-1K val · Top-1 accuracy70.94 -> 71.49HelpedUnveiling the Hidden Structure of Self-Attention via Kernel Principal Component Analysis (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Apply full LayerNorm in every layerDarcy flow, 441 tokens, 2 layers · test error3.09% -> 3.45%HurtNeural Interpretable PDEs: Harmonizing Fourier Insights with Attention for Scalable and Interpretable Physics Discovery (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
remove the CBSA contraction stepImageNet-1K · top-1 accuracy63.2 -> 63.8; 71.4 -> 71.8HelpedTowards Interpretable and Efficient Attention: Compressing All by Contracting a Few (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Remove the attention biasImageNet-1K · Acc@187.144% -> 9.376%HurtFlashBias: Fast Computation of Attention with Bias (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
add feature simulationBooks3, training length 1024 · perplexity22.43 -> 22.14HelpedSAS: Simulated Attention Score (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 30 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 30 papers
  • ImageNet-1K · 2 of 30 papers
  • Wikitext · 2 of 30 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 91 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 39 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy