AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Attention and transformers

Transformer expressivity and learnability

Theoretically analyzes what algorithms and structured data transformers can represent and learn.

217 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2019–2026) · an approach in Attention and transformers, keyword cluster “vision · vit · transformers”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

65 papers in 2023–24 and 134 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 11.1% to 11.5%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 1192020: 2202021: 4212022: 11222023: 21232024: 44242025: 62252026: 7226

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

131 papers here report 1,197 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 62%, no clear effect 10%, hurt 23%, mixed 5%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
skip middle layersLlama2 benchmarks · normalized medianHurtTransformer Layers as Painters (AAAI 2025 · 10 citations)
Train count examples across a range of lengths instead of using sequences all of the same lengthLength generalization · exact matchHelpedWhat Algorithms can Transformers Learn? A Study in Length Generalization (ICLR 2024 · 8 citations)
Apply laziness to MHSA only rather than to MHSA and Feedforward togetherImageNet 256×256, DDIM 20 steps · generation performanceHurtLazyDiT: Lazy Learning for the Acceleration of Diffusion Transformers (AAAI 2025 · 6 citations)
Replace Softmax attention with scaled-σ attentionWikiText-103 · perplexity18.98 -> 19.07HurtConverting Transformers to Polynomial Form for Secure Inference Over Homomorphic Encryption (ICML 2024 · 6 citations)
Use an 8-layer recurrent block with 2 recurrences instead of a non-recurrent 16-layer modelAddition, OOD · error ratehalf the errorHelpedTransformers Can Do Arithmetic with the Right Embeddings (NeurIPS 2024 · 6 citations)
Add the negative-mover intervention alongside the inhibition-head interventionColored Objects · accuracy81.5% -> 93.7%HelpedCircuit Component Reuse Across Tasks in Transformer Language Models (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)
Use 20 warmup epochsMain dataset · accuracy89.48 -> 87.65HurtEureka-Moments in Transformers: Multi-Step Tasks Reveal Softmax Induced Optimization Problems (ICML 2024 · 3 citations)
Use Hard-ALiBi positional encodingLength generalization from strings ≤ 50 to strings up to 1000 · string-level accuracyHelpedRepeat After Me: Transformers are Better than State Space Models at Copying (ICML 2024 · 3 citations)
Use mixed representation instead of contextual representationBiRD · Pearson correlation20.19 -> 27.72HelpedTowards Equipping Transformer with the Ability of Systematic Compositionality (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
Increase the number of attention headsαβα vs. αββ template task · test lossHelpedWhen can transformers reason with abstract symbols? (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
add the log transform to relative distancesC4 validation, sequence length 8192 · log perplexity3.334 -> 3.085HelpedFunctional Interpolation for Relative Positions improves Long Context Transformers (ICLR 2024 · 2 citations)
adapt attention and positional bias jointly instead of using f(B) aloneBooks, train 512, eval 8192 · perplexity23.49 -> 17.88HelpedDAPE: Data-Adaptive Positional Encoding for Length Extrapolation (NeurIPS 2024 · 2 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 90 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet-1k · 5 of 90 papers
  • ImageNet · 3 of 90 papers
  • OpenWebText · 3 of 90 papers
  • Countdown · 2 of 90 papers
  • CIFAR-100 · 2 of 90 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 2 of 90 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 90 papers

Baselines

  • MLP · 4 of 90 papers
  • NoPE · 3 of 90 papers
  • LSTM · 3 of 90 papers
  • RoPE · 3 of 90 papers
  • PonderNet · 2 of 90 papers
  • FIRE · 2 of 90 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 199 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 38 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy