AI Paper Atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Face and shape

Primitive-based shape abstraction

Represents shapes with learned primitives, parts and implicit grids for retrieval and generation.

99 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Face and shape, keyword cluster “3d shape · shapes · object”

State History Benchmarks Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

12 papers in 2023–24 and 12 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic held steady, from 3.3% to 3.3%.

No longer reported by papers here: ModelNet40 (mAP, last in 2019).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 4162017: 7172018: 11182019: 11192020: 14202021: 13212022: 15222023: 7232024: 5242025: 4252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

ModelNet40 · mAP (higher is better)

5 papers, 2018–2019 · not reported since 2019

2018: 85.382019: 89.23
20182019

What has been tried

87 papers here report 862 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 74%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 17%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add ControlNet texturingSHREC’19 · acc17.20 -> 26.41HelpedDiffusion 3D Features (Diff3F): Decorating Untextured Shapes with Distilled Semantic Features (CVPR 2024 · 29 citations)
distill GLIP predictions into a 3D student rather than transfer boxes directlyShapeNetPart Chair · mIoU (%)60.1 -> 73.5HelpedPartDistill: 3D Shape Part Segmentation by Vision-Language Model Distillation (CVPR 2024 · 18 citations)
add the feature adapterPASCAL3D+ · 30° accuracy25.9 -> 75.3HelpedCommon3D: Self-Supervised Learning of 3D Morphable Models for Common Objects in Neural Feature Space (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
add diversity constraintObstacle (multiple shapes) · δ_mean0.12 -> 0.15HurtGeometry-Informed Neural Networks (ICML 2025 · 2 citations)
Replace the VN-SPD constraint with standard VN layers, centering, and normalizationPCN · CD-ℓ18.59 -> 9.31HurtLearning Generalizable Shape Completion with SIM(3) Equivariance (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Add indexation invariance using circular padding and indexation-invariant reconstruction losssMNIST · F1-score0.88 ± 0.01 -> 0.95 ± 0.00HelpedShapeEmbed: a self-supervised learning framework for 2D contour quantification (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use triplet training instead of pairwise trainingHomography-Perturbed MNIST · accuracy92.52 (± 0.91) -> 97.38 (± 0.23)HelpedNeural Isometries: Taming Transformations for Equivariant ML (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 5 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MPEG-7 CE-Shape-1 Part B · 2 of 5 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 24 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 37 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy