atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

Cross-Modal Stealth: A Coarse-to-Fine Attack Framework for RGB-T Tracker

AAAI 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Unimodal-to-multimodal representation transfer · 3 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CMS, a two-stage coarse-to-fine adversarial patch attack (RGB StyleGAN2-latent patch plus thermal shape mask) with pixel- and semantic-level correlation-breaking losses and a point-tracking-based reprojection for physical deployment against RGB-T trackers.

Problem

Adversarial attacks on RGB-T cross-modal trackers are unexplored, and cross-modal complementarity makes attacks hard; physical patches also suffer distortion from viewing angles.

Approach

A coarse-to-fine latent-space generator produces an RGB patch (StyleGAN2-based semantic adversarial patch refined by a texture network) and a thermal black-mask shape from the same adversarial latent, trained with center-away, pixel-level and semantic-level correlation-breaking losses; a TAPIR keypoint-tracking homography reprojects the patch across frames for physical robustness.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
apply CMS rather than TTAttackRGBT tracking on RGBT234 · RGBT234, ViPTPR: 0.695 -> 0.578Helped
apply CMS rather than CSARGBT tracking on LasHeR · LasHeR, ViPTPR: 0.562 -> 0.310Helped
use CMS rather than CSA on MANetMANet tracking on LasHeR · LasHeR, MANetPR: 0.328 -> 0.389Hurt
use a two-stage coarse-to-fine patch rather than a single-stage patch (ablation)CMS on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.648 -> 0.578; 0.621 -> 0.578Helped
add a thermal patch to the attack instead of using only the thermal patch (ablation)CMS on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.782 -> 0.578Helped
add semantic-level correlation loss (ablation)CMS on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.666 -> 0.578Helped
add pixel-level correlation loss (ablation)CMS on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.604 -> 0.578Helped
use point tracking-based reprojection rather than center pasting (ablation)CMS in physical domain · Physical domain, ViPTPR: 0.851 -> 0.709Helped
use point tracking-based reprojection rather than random transformation (ablation)CMS in physical domain · Physical domain, ViPTPR: 0.801 -> 0.709Helped
increase patch size ratio from 1.5 to 1.6 (ablation)CMS on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.600 -> 0.578Helped
increase patch size ratio beyond 1.6 (ablation)CMS on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.578 -> 0.504; 0.504 -> 0.463; 0.463 -> 0.438Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: RGBT234 LasHeR

Benchmarks: RGBT234 LasHeR

Metrics: precision rate success rate performance drop

Baselines: CSA TTAttack random noise patch

Builds on: StyleGAN2 TAPIR CSA NatPatch

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy