atlas

Research map / Architectures and efficiency / Attention and transformers

Cross-modulated Attention Transformer for RGBT Tracking

AAAI 2025 · Architectures and efficiency › Attention and transformers · approach: Block-sparse attention kernels · 26 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes CAFormer, an RGBT tracker whose unified cross-modulated attention modulates each modality's search-template correlation map using the other modality's correlations, plus a collaborative token elimination strategy for speed.

Problem

Transformer RGBT trackers compute per-modality search-template correlations independently, so low-quality inputs yield ambiguous, inaccurate attention weights, and separate self- and cross-attention adds redundant computation.

Approach

Treats RGB and TIR correlation maps as mutually consistent: a Correlation Modulated Enhancement module uses both modalities' ST (search-to-template) correlation parts to modulate each other, unifying self-attention and cross-attention in one attention model; a collaborative token elimination sums per-modality token similarities to prune background tokens.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add cross-modal correlation modulation (ablation)CAFormer · RGBT234PR: 87.5 -> 88.3Helped
Add cross-modal correlation modulation (ablation)CAFormer · LasHeRPR: 68.3 -> 70.0Helped
Include SS when modulating ST (ablation)CAFormer · RGBT234PR: 87.6 -> 88.3Helped
Include SS when modulating ST (ablation)CAFormer · LasHeRPR: 69.2 -> 70.0Helped
Apply CME to ST rather than SS or TS (ablation)CAFormer · RGBT234PR: 87.8 -> 88.3; 87.7 -> 88.3Helped
Apply CME jointly to ST and SS instead of ST only (ablation)CAFormer · RGBT234PR: 88.3 -> 86.4Hurt
Use CAFormer blocks in the last 3 layers rather than the last 1 layer (ablation)CAFormer · RGBT234PR: 87.5 -> 88.3Helped
Use CAFormer blocks in the last 6 layers instead of the last 3 layers (ablation)CAFormer · RGBT234PR: 88.3 -> 86.6Hurt
Place CAFormer blocks in layers 4, 7, and 10 instead of the last 3 layers (ablation)CAFormer · RGBT234PR: 88.3 -> 88.5Mixed
Use collaborative token elimination (CTE) instead of no elimination (ablation)CAFormer · LasHeRPR: 69.3 -> 70.0Helped
Use candidate elimination (CE) instead of no elimination (ablation)CAFormer · LasHeRPR: 69.3 -> 69.5Helped
Use CTE instead of CE (ablation)CAFormer · LasHeRPR: 69.5 -> 70.0Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LasHeR VTUAV

Benchmarks: GTOT RGBT210 RGBT234 LasHeR VTUAV

Metrics: Precision Rate (PR) Success Rate (SR) Normalized Precision Rate (NPR) FPS MACs

Baselines: TBSI ViPT MACFT TATrack OneTracker Un-Track SDSTrack HMFT mfDiMP CAT

Builds on: OSTrack ViT candidate elimination

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy