atlas

Research map / Adversarial robustness and security / Attacks on text and graphs

Reproducibility Study on Adversarial Attacks Against Robust Transformer Trackers

NeurIPS 2024 · Adversarial robustness and security › Attacks on text and graphs · approach: Physical adversarial patches and camouflage

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Reproducibility study evaluating four existing adversarial attacks (SPARK, RTAA white-box; IoU, CSA black-box) against seven object trackers, including three transformer trackers, on VOT2022ST, UAV123 and GOT10k.

Problem

Whether existing adversarial attacks designed for Siamese/discriminative trackers remain effective against transformer-based visual object trackers, which lack the classification/regression outputs those attacks exploit.

Approach

Applies existing attacks (SPARK, RTAA, IoU, CSA) to transformer trackers (TransT, TransT-SEG, MixFormer/MixFormerM, ROMTrack) and studies sensitivity to bounding box vs mask outputs, perturbation levels, IoU upper bounds, and transformer vs non-transformer backbones.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply SPARK instead of no attackTransT-SEG · VOT2022 STBEAO: 0.299 -> 0.012Hurt
Apply CSA instead of no attackMixFormerM · VOT2022 STBEAO: 0.303 -> 0.308No clear effect
Apply IoU instead of no attackMixFormerM · VOT2022 STSEAO: 0.589 -> 0.359Hurt
Apply IoU instead of no attackROMTrack · GOT10kAO: 0.729 -> 0.597Hurt
Increase IoU attack upper bound from ζ=8000 to ζ=12000 (ablation)ROMTrack · UAV123AUC: 66.85 -> 63.61Hurt
Increase SPARK perturbation level from ε=2.55 to ε=40.8 (ablation)TransT · VOT2022ST bubblenumber of highly perturbed frames: $7$ -> $14$Hurt
Increase SPARK perturbation level from ε=2.55 to ε=40.8 (ablation)TransT · VOT2022ST bubbleL1 norm: $176.04$ -> $183.98$Hurt
Vary perturbation level for SPARK (ablation)TransT · UAV123success and precisionNo clear effect
Increase perturbation level for RTAA from ε=2.55 to ε=40.8 (ablation)TransT · UAV123tracking performanceMixed
Evaluate binary masks rather than bounding boxes under attackTransT-SEG · VOT2022accuracy: 48.30% -> 64.48%Hurt
Apply RTAA rather than SPARKTransT · GOT10kAO: 0.137 -> 0.048Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: VOT2022ST UAV123 GOT10k DAVIS2016

Benchmarks: VOT2022ST UAV123 GOT10k

Metrics: EAO accuracy robustness AUC precision normalized precision AO SR0.5 SR0.75 SSIM

Baselines: SPARK RTAA IoU attack CSA SiamRPN DaSiamRPN DiMP PrDiMP

Builds on: SPARK RTAA IoU attack Cooling-Shrinking Attack TransT MixFormer ROMTrack

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy