atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Cross-modal learning

ACAttack: Adaptive Cross Attacking RGB-T Tracker via Multi-Modal Response Decoupling

CVPR 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Cross-modal learning · approach: Unimodal-to-multimodal representation transfer · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes ACAttack, an adaptive cross-attack framework that generates multi-modal adversarial patches (visible texture plus shared infrared shape) to fool RGB-T trackers in digital and physical settings.

Problem

Adversarial attacks on RGB-T multi-modal trackers have been largely unexplored; existing tracker attacks target RGB only and fail to break modal balance and cross-modal feature enhancement in RGB-T trackers.

Approach

Alternately weakens the modality with higher response contribution (via a reciprocal response-map distance softmax), adds a modal disturbance loss that pushes apart single-modal response maps, and a spatio-temporal loss with progressively enlarged pseudo-GT boxes; the patches share one adversarial shape for physical deployment.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
apply ACAttack instead of no attackViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.835 -> 0.621Helped
apply ACAttack instead of MTDViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.739 -> 0.621Helped
apply ACAttack instead of no attackViPT · LasHeRSR: 0.525 -> 0.350Helped
apply ACAttack instead of no attackBAT · RGBT234PR: 0.868 -> 0.750Helped
apply ACAttack instead of no attackSDSTrack · LasHeRSR: 0.531 -> 0.331Helped
add spatio-temporal joint loss (ablation)ACAttack on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.709 -> 0.621Helped
add modal disturbance loss (ablation)ACAttack on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.735 -> 0.621Helped
use K=0 coarse adversarial samples rather than the full setting (ablation)ACAttack on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.621 -> 0.672Hurt
use K=9 coarse adversarial samples rather than the full setting (ablation)ACAttack on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.621 -> 0.651Hurt
use alternating cross iteration rather than joint optimization (ablation)ACAttack on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.703 -> 0.645Helped
attack only RGB rather than both modalities (ablation)ACAttack on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.621 -> 0.691Hurt
attack only TIR rather than both modalities (ablation)ACAttack on ViPT · RGBT234PR: 0.621 -> 0.669Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: RGBT234

Benchmarks: RGBT234 LasHeR

Metrics: precision rate success rate

Baselines: Random noise patch MTD ViPT BAT SDSTrack

Builds on: projected gradient descent MTD ViPT BAT SDSTrack

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy