atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

DexTrack: Towards Generalizable Neural Tracking Control for Dexterous Manipulation from Human References

ICLR 2025 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Dexterous manipulation transfer · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Trains a generalizable neural dexterous-hand tracking controller from large curated robot tracking demonstrations, mined iteratively with a homotopy optimization scheme and a learned homotopy path generator, combining RL and imitation learning.

Problem

Learning a generalizable, robust neural controller that makes a dexterous robot hand track human hand-object kinematic references for diverse objects and manipulation skills, where RL needs task-specific rewards and trajectory optimization needs accurate dynamics.

Approach

Iteratively alternate between mining high-quality per-trajectory tracking demonstrations (RL with tracking-controller priors and homotopy optimization over simplified-to-complex reference paths, with a diffusion-based homotopy path generator) and training the neural controller jointly with RL reward and action-imitation loss on those demonstrations (data flywheel).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add high-quality tracking demonstrations and homotopy optimization (ablation)DexTrack · GRAB testsuccess rate (10cm-20°-0.8 / 10cm-40°-1.2): 39.59/57.87 -> 46.70/65.48Helped
add high-quality tracking demonstration data (ablation)DexTrack with homotopy optimization · GRAB testsuccess rate (10cm-20°-0.8 / 10cm-40°-1.2): 43.15/62.44 -> 46.70/65.48Helped
add high-quality tracking demonstrations and homotopy optimization (ablation)DexTrack · TACO testsuccess rate (10cm-20°-0.8 / 10cm-40°-1.2): 44.83/67.00 -> 48.77/74.38Helped
add high-quality tracking demonstration data (ablation)DexTrack with homotopy optimization · TACO testsuccess rate (10cm-20°-0.8 / 10cm-40°-1.2): 47.78/72.41 -> 48.77/74.38Helped
increase demonstration data from 0.1 to 1.0 of the original size (ablation)DexTrack · TACO testsuccess rate (10cm-20°-0.8 / 10cm-40°-1.2): 36.45/59.61 -> 48.77/74.38Helped
train on all GRAB training trajectories instead of the selected high-quality subset (ablation)DexTrack · GRAB testsuccess rate: 42.13% and 60.41%Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: GRAB TACO

Benchmarks: GRAB TACO

Metrics: object rotation error object translation error wrist error finger error success rate (10cm-20deg-0.8 and 10cm-40deg-1.2 thresholds)

Baselines: DGrasp PPO (OmniGrasp rew.) PPO (w/o sup., tracking rew.)

Builds on: PPO OmniGrasp DART DGrasp chain-of-thought

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy