atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Robot action and navigation

VICtoR: Learning Hierarchical Vision-Instruction Correlation Rewards for Long-horizon Manipulation

ICLR 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Robot action and navigation · approach: Memory and subgoal-based manipulation · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces VICtoR, a hierarchical vision-instruction correlation reward model that decomposes long-horizon tasks into stages and motions using GPT-4 task knowledge, trained only on action-free motion-level videos, and shows improved RL success on long-horizon manipulation.

Problem

Learning reward models for long-horizon robotic manipulation from action-free videos and language instructions; existing VIC reward models lack sub-stage awareness, struggle with task complexity, and poorly estimate object states.

Approach

A hierarchical reward model combining an LLM-generated task decomposition (stages, required object states, motions), a CLIP-based stage detector using object-state classification over MDETR crops, and a motion progress evaluator trained with time, motion, and language-frame contrastive losses; the potential function sums preceding motions plus in-motion progress and is used for potential-based rew

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use hierarchical stage, motion, and progress rewards instead of no reward signals (ablation)VICtoR · open box then pick blue blocksuccess rate: 0.0% -> 96.4%Helped
add stage reward (ablation)VICtoR · open box then pick blue blocksuccess rate: 0.0% -> 22.8%Helped
add motion reward to stage reward (ablation)VICtoR · open box then pick blue blocksuccess rate: 22.8% -> 29.7%Helped
add progress reward to stage and motion rewards (ablation)VICtoR · open box then pick blue blocksuccess rate: 29.7% -> 96.4%Helped
add language-frame contrastive loss (ablation)VICtoR Motion Progress Evaluator · open box then pick blue blocksuccess rate: 0.0% -> 96.4%Helped
add motion contrastive loss (ablation)VICtoR Motion Progress Evaluator · open box then pick blue blocksuccess rate: 61.8% -> 96.4%Helped
add time contrastive loss (ablation)VICtoR Motion Progress Evaluator · open box then pick blue blocksuccess rate: 94.0% -> 96.4%Helped
use hierarchical VICtoR instead of LOReLpolicy learning with VIC rewards · open box + pick blocksuccess rate: 35.1% -> 96.4%Helped
use hierarchical VICtoR instead of LOReLpolicy learning with VIC rewards · move blocksuccess rate: 0.0% -> 58.9%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: simulated CoppeliaSim motion-level demos XSkill

Benchmarks: custom CoppeliaSim long-horizon manipulation tasks XSkill real-world videos

Metrics: success rate potential curve monotonicity

Baselines: Sparse Reward Stage Reward LOReL LIV VICtoR (task)

Builds on: CLIP LOReL LIV MDETR PPO

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy