atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Submodular and game algorithms

A Matching-Based Algorithm for the Traveling Tournament Problem

AAAI 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Submodular and game algorithms · approach: Opponent modeling and subgame solving · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a minimum-weight-matching-based construction with randomized labeling for TTP-4, giving a 1.625+ε approximation (improving 1.7+ε) and improving best-known results on 9 benchmark instances by 6.65% on average.

Problem

Traveling Tournament Problem with at-most-4 consecutive home/away constraint (TTP-4): design a feasible double round-robin schedule minimizing total travel distance.

Approach

Pack teams into super-teams formed from two minimum-weight-matching edges (instead of 4-cycles) so that almost every team plays 4 consecutive away games along two matching edges; add two new lower bounds tied to the matching and a uniformly random labeling of matching edges to get a simpler analysis and a 1.625+ε approximation.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Replace the prior construction with a minimum-weight-matching-based constructionTTP-4 approximation algorithm · TTP-4approximation ratio: 1.7 + ε -> 1.625+εHelped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchTTP-4 benchmark instances where n ≡ 0 (mod 8) · 9 benchmark instancesimprovement ratio: average improvement ratio of 6.65%Helped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchGalaxy40 · Galaxy40traveling cost: 216863 -> 212680; 1.93%Helped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchGalaxy32 · Galaxy32traveling cost: 104433 -> 103054; 1.32%Helped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchGalaxy24 · Galaxy24traveling cost: 40832 -> 39453; 3.38%Helped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchGalaxy16 · Galaxy16traveling cost: 14365 -> 13188; 8.19%Helped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchNFL32 · NFL32traveling cost: 809725 -> 779620; 3.72%Helped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchNFL24 · NFL24traveling cost: 436531 -> 403660; 7.53%Helped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchNFL16 · NFL16traveling cost: 235936 -> 213649; 9.45%Helped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchNL16 · NL16traveling cost: 263745 -> 229301; 13.06%Helped
Use the matching-based algorithm with pair-wise swapping local searchBrazil24 · Brazil24traveling cost: 464921 -> 412399; 11.30%Helped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: TTP benchmark instances (Trick 2024 website), 9 instances with n divisible by 8

Benchmarks: Galaxy40 Galaxy32 Galaxy24 Galaxy16 NFL32 NFL24 NFL16 NL16 Brazil24

Metrics: total travel distance improvement ratio over best-known approximation ratio

Baselines: Westphal and Noparlik 2014 best-known results Zhao, Xiao, and Xu 2022 1.7-approximation

Builds on: packing-and-extending technique for TTP-k Zhao, Xiao and Xu 2022 4-cycle based 1.7-approximation Westphal and Noparlik 2014 Hamiltonian cycle and LKH approach

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy