atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

RLZero: Direct Policy Inference from Language Without In-Domain Supervision

NeurIPS 2025 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Probabilistic and autonomous RL · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes RLZero, which turns a language prompt into a zero-shot policy by imagining a video with a text-conditioned generator, projecting frames to agent observations via SigLIP retrieval, and imitating them in closed form with a pretrained Forward-Backward behavior foundation model.

Problem

Mapping arbitrary natural-language task instructions to executable RL policies without in-domain labeled trajectories, task-specific training, or test-time learning.

Approach

Imagine (text-to-video generation from unsupervised world-model training), project (SigLIP nearest-neighbor retrieval of offline observations), and imitate (closed-form latent inference in a successor-feature BFM using a shaped distribution-matching reward e^nu = rho^E/rho), giving a single policy per environment with no gradient steps at test time.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use RLZero instead of GenRLLanguage-to-behavior across 25 tasks · Language-to-behavior, 25 tasksGPT-4o win rate: 76.8% -> 83.2%Helped
use RLZero instead of GenRLLanguage-to-behavior across 25 tasks · Language-to-behavior, 25 tasksdistribution-matching return: 246.48 -> 295.11Helped
use RLZero instead of SMODICECross-embodied imitation on Stickman · StickmanGPT-4o win rate: 80%Helped
use RLZero instead of SMODICECross-embodied imitation on HumEnv · HumEnvGPT-4o win rate: 100%Helped
remove video imagination and projection and map language embeddings directly to BFM skill embeddings (ablation)RLZero on Walker · Walker language tasksGPT-4o win rate against TD3 base model: 91.4% -> 65.71%Hurt
add a discriminator for the imitation reward (ablation)RLZero on language-to-behavior tasks · Language-to-behavior, 25 tasksaverage GPT-4o win rate: 83.2% -> 82.4%No clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: ExoRL RND exploration dataset (Cheetah, Walker, Quadruped, Stickman) YouTube and AI-generated videos for cross-embodiment

Benchmarks: DeepMind Control Suite (Walker, Cheetah, Quadruped, Stickman) HumEnv 3D humanoid

Metrics: GPT-4o pairwise win rate distribution matching return under discriminator reward statistical significance (Mann-Whitney U)

Baselines: IQL with image-language reward TD3 with image-language reward TD3 with video-language reward IQL with video-language reward GenRL SMODICE

Builds on: GenRL Forward-Backward representations ExoRL SMODICE VLM-RL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy