atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Dynamical systems

Dynamics-Aligned Latent Imagination in Contextual World Models for Zero-Shot Generalization

NeurIPS 2025 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Dynamical systems · approach: Latent-space control and planning · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DALI, which adds a self-supervised forward-dynamics context encoder to DreamerV3 to infer latent contexts (gravity, string length, actuator strength) and reports zero-shot gains in DMC Ball-in-Cup and Walker extrapolation.

Problem

Zero-shot generalization in contextual MDPs when context variables (e.g., gravity, friction) are latent and not observed, so agents cannot condition on them directly.

Approach

A context encoder over short K-length observation-action windows is trained with a forward-dynamics loss (plus an optional cross-modal alignment loss to the RSSM posterior) and injected into DreamerV3 either shallowly (encoder input) or deeply (recurrent, reward, continue, decoder, actor-critic), with theoretical claims about mutual information and sample complexity.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
infer latent context with DALI-S-χ instead of Dreamer-DRDreamerV3 on Ball-in-Cup · Featurized ExtrapolationIQM: +87.9%Helped
infer latent context with DALI-S-χ instead of Dreamer-DRDreamerV3 on Ball-in-Cup · Pixel ExtrapolationIQM: +96.4%Helped
infer context with DALI-S-χ instead of ground-truth context conditioningDreamerV3 on Ball-in-Cup · Featurized ExtrapolationIQM: 0.3720 vs. 0.2270, 0.2780Helped
infer context with DALI-S-χ instead of ground-truth context conditioningDreamerV3 on Ball-in-Cup · Pixel ExtrapolationIQM: 0.2730 vs. 0.1870, 0.2420Helped
add cross-modal regularization to the forward-dynamics objective (ablation)DALI-S on Ball-in-Cup · All regimes and modalitiesIQMHelped
add cross-modal regularization to the forward-dynamics objective (ablation)DALI-S on Walker Walk · Most regimes and modalitiesIQM: 0.7810 vs. 0.7770; 0.7580 vs. 0.7330Hurt
use inferred context instead of ground-truth context conditioningDreamerV3 on Walker Walk · Featurized ExtrapolationIQM: 0.7810, 0.7770 vs. 0.7020, 0.7490Helped
use inferred context instead of ground-truth context conditioningDreamerV3 on Ball-in-Cup · Pixel MixedIQM: 0.6250 vs. 0.6030Hurt
use inferred context instead of ground-truth context conditioningDreamerV3 on Walker Walk · Pixel ExtrapolationIQM: 0.7770 vs. 0.7580Hurt
use DALI-S instead of Dreamer-DRDreamerV3 on Walker Walk · Featurized ExtrapolationIQM: +4.0%Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DMC Ball-in-Cup (CARL contexts) DMC Walker Walk (CARL contexts)

Benchmarks: CARL Ball-in-Cup CARL Walker Walk

Metrics: IQM probability of improvement AUC

Baselines: Dreamer-DR cRSSM-S cRSSM-D

Builds on: DreamerV3 contextual MDP CARL rliable

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy