atlas

Research map / Vision-language and multimodal / Robot action and navigation

$\textit{HiMaCon:}$ Discovering Hierarchical Manipulation Concepts from Unlabeled Multi-Modal Data

NeurIPS 2025 · Vision-language and multimodal › Robot action and navigation · approach: Memory and subgoal-based manipulation · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes HiMaCon, a self-supervised method that learns hierarchical manipulation concept latents from unlabeled multi-modal robot demonstrations via cross-modal mask-and-predict and multi-horizon future prediction, then uses them as an auxiliary prediction target for ACT and Diffusion Policy on LIBERO and a real Mobile ALOHA robot.

Problem

Robot manipulation policies fail to generalize to novel objects, obstacles, and environments; the paper seeks transferable, hierarchical representations of manipulation patterns learned without human annotation.

Approach

Learn continuous concept latents with a cross-modal correlation network (mask-and-predict over modality bipartitions, a conditional-MI proxy) and a multi-horizon future predictor conditioned on a coherence threshold epsilon that segments demonstrations into sub-processes; then train policies to jointly predict actions and concepts.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use HiMaCon concepts rather than XSkill conceptsACT · LIBERO-90 (L90-90)success rate (%): 73.4 -> 74.8Helped
use HiMaCon concepts rather than XSkill conceptsDiffusion Policy · LIBERO-90 (L90-90)success rate (%): 87.7 -> 89.6Helped
use HiMaCon concepts rather than the strongest baseline, RPTACT · LIBERO-LONG (L90-L)success rate (%): 59.0 -> 63.0Helped
use HiMaCon concepts rather than NextDiffusion Policy · LIBERO-LONG (L90-L)success rate (%): 83.0 -> 89.0Helped
use HiMaCon concepts rather than DINOv2ACT · LIBERO-GOAL (L90-G)success rate (%): 77.3 -> 81.0Helped
use HiMaCon concepts rather than XSkill or DecisionNCE-motionDiffusion Policy · LIBERO-GOAL (L90-G)success rate (%): 93.0 -> 95.7Helped
include proprioceptive state rather than omit it (ablation)HiMaCon + ACT · LIBERO-90success rate (%): 70.1 -> 74.8Helped
include proprioceptive state rather than omit it (ablation)HiMaCon + Diffusion Policy · LIBERO-90success rate (%): 84.3 -> 89.6Helped
use L=2 rather than L=3 for the ACT concept head at λmc=1.0 (ablation)ACT with HiMaCon concepts · LIBERO-90success rate (%): 70.0±0.4 -> 74.8±0.8Helped
use L=2 rather than L=4 for the ACT concept head at λmc=1.0 (ablation)ACT with HiMaCon concepts · LIBERO-90success rate (%): 72.6±0.5 -> 74.8±0.8Helped
increase ACT concept loss weight from λmc=0.1 to λmc=1.0 at L=2 (ablation)ACT with HiMaCon concepts · LIBERO-90success rate (%): 70.6±0.8 -> 74.8±0.8Helped
replace uniform ε sampling with sparse sampling (ablation)HiMaCon concept learning · LIBERO-90success rate (%): 74.8±0.8 -> 67.6±0.5 (ACT); 89.6±0.6 -> 81.1±0.8 (DP)Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LIBERO-90 LIBERO-LONG LIBERO-GOAL BridgeDataV2

Benchmarks: LIBERO-90 LIBERO-LONG LIBERO-GOAL Mobile ALOHA cup cleaning (real-world)

Metrics: success rate (%) conditional mutual information sub-goal similarity

Baselines: InfoCon XSkill DecisionNCE RPT CLIP DINOv2 Plain imitation learning Next-step prediction All-masked variant

Builds on: Diffusion Policy ACT InfoCon XSkill RPT

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy