atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Human-AI and goal-conditioned

Learning to Assist Humans without Inferring Rewards

NeurIPS 2024 · Multi-agent systems and games › Human-AI and goal-conditioned · approach: Human-AI coordination agents · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes Empowerment via Successor Representations (ESR), learning contrastive successor representations to estimate effective empowerment and using them as an RL reward to train assistive agents without inferring human rewards.

Problem

Assisting humans without inferring their reward functions, since reward inference is hard in high-dimensional settings and prior empowerment estimators (e.g., AvE via random rollouts) do not scale.

Approach

Estimate effective empowerment (mutual information between the human's current action and discounted future states under current behavior policies) using two contrastive representations whose inner-product difference gives a log probability ratio; maximize it with SAC as an intrinsic reward for the assistant.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use ESR instead of Reward InferenceOvercooked assistant · Overcooked Asymmetric Advantagesreward: 60.33 ± 0.26 -> 72.00 ± 5.37Helped
Use ESR instead of Reward InferenceOvercooked assistant · Overcooked Coordination Ringreward: 5.96 ± 0.20 -> 8.40 ± 0.69Helped
Use ESR instead of RandomOvercooked assistant · Overcooked Coordination Ringreward: 6.02 -> 8.40 ± 0.69Helped
Use ESR instead of RandomOvercooked assistant · Overcooked Cramped Roomreward: 69.26 -> 91.33 ± 4.08Helped
Use ESR instead of Reward InferenceOvercooked assistant · Overcooked Cramped Roomreward: 39.24 ± 0.35 -> 91.33 ± 4.08Helped
Add conditioning on the robot action to the learned representations (ablation)ESR · Obstacle GridworldrewardHelped
Use a non-greedy policy with γ = 0.9 instead of a greedy policy with γ = 0 (ablation)ESR · 5x5 Gridworld with 10 obstaclesrewardHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Obstacle gridworld (N=2,5,7,10 blocks) Overcooked (Asymmetric Advantages, Coordination Ring, Cramped Room)

Benchmarks: Obstacle gridworld Overcooked

Metrics: episode reward

Baselines: AvE Reward Inference Goal Inference Random

Builds on: empowerment (AvE) InfoNCE soft actor-critic assistance games

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy