atlas

Research map / Probabilistic and scientific modeling / Molecules and proteins

QueST: Self-Supervised Skill Abstractions for Learning Continuous Control

NeurIPS 2024 · Probabilistic and scientific modeling › Molecules and proteins · approach: Neuro-symbolic probabilistic layers · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes QueST, a causal FSQ-quantized skill autoencoder with a GPT-style skill prior that learns discrete temporal action abstractions for multitask and few-shot robot imitation.

Problem

Generalization of robot policies to new tasks in low-data regimes; existing discrete latent skill models (VQ-BeT, PRISE) have architectures that don't capture transferable, temporally structured action abstractions.

Approach

An encoder with causal strided convolutions and masked self-attention maps an action sequence to multiple FSQ-quantized skill tokens, and a decoder cross-attends fixed sinusoidal queries to those tokens, so the latent sequence is causal yet decoder sees all codes; a transformer prior autoregressively predicts skill tokens from observations and task embedding.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
replace FSQ with VQ (ablation)QueST · LIBERO-90 and LIBERO few-shotsuccess rate: 88.6 \pm 0.4 -> 81.2 \pm 0.6; 68.8 \pm 1.7 -> 62.5 \pm 2.0Hurt
condition the decoder on observations (ablation)QueST · LIBERO-90 and LIBERO few-shotsuccess rate: 88.6 \pm 0.4 -> 81.9 \pm 1.1; 68.8 \pm 1.7 -> 61.3 \pm 2.2Hurt
replace cross-attention decoder with a mirrored decoder (ablation)QueST · LIBERO-90 and LIBERO few-shotsuccess rate: 88.6 \pm 0.4 -> 86.3 \pm 0.9; 68.8 \pm 1.7 -> 45.4 \pm 2.0Hurt
add causal masking to the encoder (ablation)QueST · LIBERO-90 and LIBERO few-shotsuccess rate: 82.0 \pm 1.6 -> 88.6 \pm 0.4; 58.8 \pm 3.0 -> 68.8 \pm 1.7Helped
add causal masking to the decoder (ablation)QueST · LIBERO-90 and LIBERO few-shotsuccess rate: 85.1 \pm 1.8 -> 88.6 \pm 0.4; 61.6 \pm 2.5 -> 68.8 \pm 1.7Helped
add causal masking to both encoder and decoder (ablation)QueST · LIBERO-90 and LIBERO few-shotsuccess rate: 78.5 \pm 0.5 -> 88.6 \pm 0.4; 56.1 \pm 1.8 -> 68.8 \pm 1.7Helped
finetune the decoder during few-shot learning (ablation)QueST · LIBERO few-shotsuccess rate: 66.0 \pm 3.6 -> 68.8 \pm 1.7Helped
increase decoder loss scale from 10 to 100 (ablation)QueST · LIBERO few-shotsuccess rate: 68.8 \pm 1.7 -> 66.0 \pm 1.0Hurt
use QueST rather than the next-best baselinemultitask imitation learning · LIBERO-90success rate: +8%Helped
use QueST rather than the next-best baselinefew-shot imitation learning · LIBERO-LONGsuccess rate: 14%Helped
finetune the decoder during few-shot learningQueST · LIBERO-LONGsuccess rate: 1.5%Hurt
use QueST rather than other methodsmultitask imitation learning · MetaWorld ML45success rateNo clear effect

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: LIBERO-90 LIBERO-LONG MetaWorld ML45

Benchmarks: LIBERO-90 LIBERO-LONG MetaWorld ML45

Metrics: success rate

Baselines: ResNet-T Diffusion Policy ACT VQ-BeT PRISE

Builds on: Finite Scalar Quantization VQ-BeT PRISE Behavior Transformer

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy