atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Combinatorial and search optimization

On Computing Makespan-Optimal Solutions for Generalized Sliding-Tile Puzzles

AAAI 2024 · Learning theory and algorithms › Combinatorial and search optimization · approach: Unsupervised neural combinatorial optimization · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Shows that makespan-optimal generalized sliding-tile puzzle (GSTP) is NP-complete and gives matching asymptotic makespan lower and upper bounds for all escort counts using Rubik table algorithm and escort-jump analysis.

Problem

Computing makespan-optimal solutions for generalized sliding-tile puzzles with multiple escorts and synchronous multi-tile moves under the corner-following constraint, which arise in warehouse automation and parking garages.

Approach

Models tile motion via escort jumps, derives a Manhattan-distance-based lower bound on makespan showing dependence on escort count, and matches it with upper bounds built by applying Rubik table row/column shuffles realized by careful sliding-tile sub-routines on 2- and 3-row grids under the corner-following constraint.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use the proposed algorithm for single-escort instancesGSTP · GSTP, single escortmakespan upper bound: 81m_1 m_2 + 6m_1 + 9m_2 - 3Helped
Use the proposed algorithm for two-escort instancesGSTP · GSTP, two escortsmakespan upper bound: 18m_1 m_2 - 4m_1 - 5m_2 - 29Helped
Use the proposed algorithm with an even number of escorts and parallel row/column shufflesGSTP · GSTP, 2 ≤ k < min(m_1, m_2), k evenmakespan upper bound: \frac{44m_1 m_2}{k} + m_1(5 - \frac{24}{k}) + 15m_2 - 29Helped
Increase the number of escorts across regimesGSTP · Random start and goal configurations across escort countsmakespan lower bound: exp. $\Omega(\dfrac{m_1 m_2}{k})$; h.p. $\Omega(\max(m_1, m_2))$Mixed
Apply the proposed construction and algorithmic boundsGSTP · GSTP across escort countsasymptotic makespan boundHelped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Metrics: makespan asymptotic bounds NP-completeness

Baselines: Prior GSTP upper bounds (single escort O(m1 m2 max(m1,m2)), 2m1+2m2-4 escorts O(

Builds on: Rubik table algorithm 15-puzzle TTFSAT (SAT variant)

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy