Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Games and equilibria
Exploiting Opponents Under Utility Constraints in Sequential Games
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
Measured effects reported in the paper
| What was changed | Where | Measured | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| use psi-approximated COX-UCB (psi = 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) instead of exact COX-UCB (ablation) | COX-UCB · Kuhn poker kuhn_7 | cumulative regret | No clear effect |
| use psi-approximated COX-UCB (psi = 0.5, 0.7, 0.9) instead of exact COX-UCB (ablation) | COX-UCB · Leduc poker leduc_2 | cumulative regret | Mixed |
| play a random strategy from the utility-constrained set instead of COX-UCB | COX-UCB · Kuhn and Leduc poker | cumulative regret | Hurt |
Closest papers by meaning
- Is Learning in Games Good for the Learners? (NeurIPS 2023 · similarity 0.89)
- Learning to Play Sequential Games versus Unknown Opponents (NeurIPS 2020 · similarity 0.89)
- Maximizing utility in multi-agent environments by anticipating the behavior of other learners (NeurIPS 2024 · similarity 0.88)
- Human-Aligned Chess With a Bit of Search (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.88)
- Learning to Steer Learners in Games (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.87)
- Advantage Alignment Algorithms (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.87)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.