atlas

Research map / Reinforcement learning / Visual and representation RL

Machine versus Human Attention in Deep Reinforcement Learning Tasks

NeurIPS 2021 · Reinforcement learning › Visual and representation RL · approach: Robust visual encoders for RL · 9 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's title only (no summary yet). Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Train PPO agents longer (attention evolves over training)PPO · Human vs RL attention, AtariCC: 0.170 -> 0.320Helped
Lower discount factor from 0.99 to 0.9 (ablation)PPO · Seaquestgame score: 15% higher scoreHelped
Lower discount factor from 0.99 to 0.9 (ablation)PPO · Ms.Pac-Mangame score: 18% higher scoreHelped
Raise discount factor to 0.9999 (ablation)PPO · Atari gamesgame scoreHurt
Use discount factor 0.9 instead of 0.99 or 0.9999 (ablation)PPO · Atari gamessimilarity to human attention (CC/KL)Helped
Discount factor 0.9 vs default 0.99 (ablation)PPO · Atari games overallgame scoreMixed

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy