atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Clustering

From Spectrum-free towards Baseline-view-free: Double-track Proximity Driven Multi-view Clustering

ICML 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Clustering · approach: Incomplete multi-view clustering

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DTP-SF-BVF, an anchor-based multi-view clustering method that adds anchor-anchor self-expression structure, learnable per-view anchor permutations (no baseline view), and directly learns discrete cluster indicators without spectral embedding.

Problem

Anchor-based multi-view clustering ignores anchor-anchor relations, suffers anchor misalignment across views due to unknown cluster orders (and needs a baseline view to fix it), and produces unstable results because spectral embedding and partitioning introduce variance.

Approach

Jointly optimize anchor-anchor self-expression (used to guide the anchor-sample graph), learnable per-view permutation matrices that align anchors to a shared binary consensus cluster indicator, and direct binary cluster-indicator learning in place of spectrum construction, all in one alternating-optimization framework.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add anchor-anchor proximity to anchor-sample proximity (ablation)DTP-SF-BVF · DERMATO, CALTE7, Cora, REU7200, Reuters, CIF10Tra4, FasMNI4VACC (%): 71.51 -> 85.47; 49.05 -> 80.66; 30.35 -> 52.44; 16.75 -> 26.22; 47.05 -> 54.26; 26.69 -> 26.83; 52.15 -> 57.36Helped
use spectrum-free binary indicators instead of spectral clustering (ablation)DTP-SF-BVF · DERMATO, CALTE7, Cora, REU7200, Reuters, CIF10Tra4, FasMNI4VACC (%): 81.33(±1.82) -> 85.47(±0.00); 74.74(±1.73) -> 80.66(±0.00); 48.27(±1.07) -> 52.44(±0.00); 23.46(±0.79) -> 26.22(±0.00); Mixed
add baseline-view-free alignment (ablation)DTP-SF-BVF · DERMATO, CALTE7, Cora, REU7200, Reuters, CIF10Tra4, FasMNI4VACC (%): 80.73 -> 85.47; 76.59 -> 80.66; 31.65 -> 52.44; 16.67 -> 26.22; 45.29 -> 54.26; 25.91 -> 26.83; 53.68 -> 57.36Helped
avoid selecting a baseline view (ablation)DTP-SF-BVF · DERMATO, CALTE7, Cora, REU7200, Reuters, CIF10Tra4, FasMNI4VACC (%): 72.37 -> 85.47; 62.43 -> 80.66; 45.78 -> 52.44; 22.87 -> 26.22; 44.36 -> 54.26; 22.98 -> 26.83; 51.22 -> 57.36Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: DERMATO CALTE7 Cora REU7200 Reuters CIF10Tra4 FasMNI4V

Benchmarks: DERMATO CALTE7 Cora REU7200 Reuters CIF10Tra4 FasMNI4V

Metrics: ACC NMI Fscore running time

Baselines: FMR PMSC AMGL MSCIAS MVSC MLRSSC MPAC MCLES FMCNOF PFSC SFMC MSGL

Builds on: anchor-based multi-view clustering subspace self-expression FMVACC

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy