atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph algorithms and clustering

Towards Learnable Anchor for Deep Multi-View Clustering

AAAI 2025 · Graph learning › Graph algorithms and clustering · approach: Anchor-based multi-view clustering

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes DMAC, a deep multi-view clustering model that makes anchors learnable via Gaussian positive-incentive perturbations, anchor graph convolution with cross-view mutual information maximization, achieving linear-time clustering.

Problem

Deep multi-view clustering with graph learning costs O(n^2) time; anchor-based alternatives use fixed, manually selected anchors that may not reflect the true cluster distribution, corrupting clustering.

Approach

Inject learnable perturbations (reparameterized Gaussian noise, treated as positive-incentive noise) into initial k-means anchors, optimize them with an anchor learning entropy loss, and derive cluster-oriented anchors via anchor graph convolution and cross-view mutual information maximization, then build the full sample graph from the learned anchors for a structure-preserving embedding.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add perturbation generation network and anchor learning loss (ablation)DMAC · YaleACC: 66.02 -> 78.18Helped
add perturbation generation network and anchor learning loss (ablation)DMAC · PIEACC: 34.12 -> 43.24Helped
add perturbation generation network and anchor learning loss (ablation)DMAC · BBCACC: 87.15 -> 88.61Helped
add perturbation generation network and anchor learning loss (ablation)DMAC · NUSACC: 24.53 -> 29.29Helped
add perturbation generation network and anchor learning loss (ablation)DMAC · CCVACC: 32.28 -> 36.18Helped
add perturbation generation network and anchor learning loss (ablation)DMAC · ALOIACC: 44.45 -> 60.35Helped
add consistency maximization loss (ablation)DMAC · YaleACC: 72.73 -> 78.18Helped
add consistency maximization loss (ablation)DMAC · PIEACC: 33.82 -> 43.24Helped
add consistency maximization loss (ablation)DMAC · BBCACC: 88.47 -> 88.61Helped
add consistency maximization loss (ablation)DMAC · NUSACC: 27.67 -> 29.29Helped
add consistency maximization loss (ablation)DMAC · CCVACC: 34.26 -> 36.18Helped
add consistency maximization loss (ablation)DMAC · ALOIACC: 54.79 -> 60.35Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Yale PIE BBC NUS CCV ALOI

Benchmarks: Yale PIE BBC NUS CCV ALOI

Metrics: ACC NMI runtime

Baselines: GMC MSGL LMVSC UDBGL CMGEC DealMVC GCFAggMVC DFP-GNN SURER

Builds on: positive-incentive noise anchor graph learning graph convolution reparameterization trick

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy