Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Human-AI and goal-conditioned
Position: Scaling Simulation is Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient for In-the-Wild Robot Manipulation
Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers
AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.
A position paper arguing that scaling robotic physics simulators is neither necessary nor sufficient for zero-shot, human-preference-compliant in-the-wild robot manipulation, and advocating passive web video, safety constraints, and real-world data collection instead.
Problem
Whether scaling physics simulation is a productive route to general-purpose, zero-shot, human-preference-compliant real-world robot manipulation.
Approach
Argues via conceptual arguments and cited prior evidence that simulators cannot match real-world physics and contact diversity, that simulation-based progress can be a false signal for real-world manipulation, and that passive human video, task-agnostic safety constraints, and scalable real-world data collection are more promising than scaling simulation.
Key results
- Cites Dasari et al. (2023) finding that visual representations performing well in simulated manipulation do not transfer well to the real world, with weak correlation between simulation and real performance.
- Argues that simulating pouring water or chopping is harder than executing the task, so simulation is not necessary for such everyday manipulation.
Surprising findings
- Simulating everyday tasks such as pouring water can be harder than executing them, so simulation may solve a harder problem than needed.
Limitations
- Argument is conceptual and relies largely on cited prior work rather than new experiments
- Scope restricted to in-the-wild manipulation; does not apply to structured industrial settings
- Acknowledges simulation can be useful for prototyping RL algorithms
Experimental setup
Builds on: domain randomization RLHF
Closest papers by meaning
- Rapidly Adapting Policies to the Real-World via Simulation-Guided Fine-Tuning (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.87)
- RobotSmith: Generative Robotic Tool Design for Acquisition of Complex Manipulation Skills (NeurIPS 2025 · similarity 0.86)
- GENMANIP: LLM-driven Simulation for Generalizable Instruction-Following Manipulation (CVPR 2025 · similarity 0.86)
- ASID: Active Exploration for System Identification in Robotic Manipulation (ICLR 2024 · similarity 0.85)
- DexScale: Automating Data Scaling for Sim2Real Generalizable Robot Control (ICML 2025 · similarity 0.85)
- Data Scaling Laws in Imitation Learning for Robotic Manipulation (ICLR 2025 · similarity 0.85)
Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.
