atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Human-AI and goal-conditioned

Position: Scaling Simulation is Neither Necessary Nor Sufficient for In-the-Wild Robot Manipulation

ICML 2024 · Multi-agent systems and games › Human-AI and goal-conditioned · approach: Embodied agent learning

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

A position paper arguing that scaling robotic physics simulators is neither necessary nor sufficient for zero-shot, human-preference-compliant in-the-wild robot manipulation, and advocating passive web video, safety constraints, and real-world data collection instead.

Problem

Whether scaling physics simulation is a productive route to general-purpose, zero-shot, human-preference-compliant real-world robot manipulation.

Approach

Argues via conceptual arguments and cited prior evidence that simulators cannot match real-world physics and contact diversity, that simulation-based progress can be a false signal for real-world manipulation, and that passive human video, task-agnostic safety constraints, and scalable real-world data collection are more promising than scaling simulation.

Key results

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Builds on: domain randomization RLHF

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy