atlas

Research map / Large language models / Agents, code and math

GENMANIP: LLM-driven Simulation for Generalizable Instruction-Following Manipulation

CVPR 2025 · Large language models › Agents, code and math · approach: LLM-driven embodied and driving agents · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces GENMANIP, an Isaac Sim tabletop simulation platform with LLM-generated task-oriented scene graphs and the 200-scenario GENMANIP-BENCH, used to benchmark modular foundation-model manipulation systems against end-to-end policies (GR-1, ACT).

Problem

Real-world manipulation policy generalization is hard to benchmark fairly; existing simulators lack diverse, controllable instruction and scenario variation for comparing modular foundation-model systems with end-to-end imitation policies.

Approach

A task-oriented scene graph (ToSG) representation, compatible with LLMs, that lets GPT-4 synthesize diverse tabletop tasks and controllable layouts, with goal-condition-based automatic evaluation, plus a unified modular manipulation system abstracted from mark-based visual prompting methods.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use GPT-4.5 with CoPA rather than other evaluated modular systemsGENMANIP-BENCH · OverallSR: 23.00Helped
Increase GR-1 behavior-cloning data from 100 to 1K episodes (ablation)GR-1 · Single-task pick banana and place it on the plateSR: 33.0% -> 95.0%Helped
Increase ACT behavior-cloning data from 100 to 1K episodes (ablation)ACT · Single-task pick banana and place it on the plateSR: 40.0% -> 72.5%Helped
Expand randomization from target-object position to all object positions in the limited region (ablation)GR-1 · Limited region randomizationSR: 78.2±9.5 -> 57.0±8.4Hurt
Expand target-object position randomization from the limited region to the full table (ablation)GR-1 · Position randomizationSR: 78.2±9.5 -> 45.5±10.1Hurt
Transfer across scene graphs and layouts (ablation)GR-1 · Full table randomization across 5 scenesSR: 45.5±10.1 -> 43.5±26.1Hurt
Use unseen instructions (ablation)GR-1 · Unseen instructionSR: 0.0±1.2Hurt
Use unseen object instances (ablation)GR-1 · Unseen objects (scenarios)SR: 0.0±0.0Hurt
Increase the number of goal conditions from 1 to 3 (ablation)Modular manipulation system · Long-horizon tasksSR: 32.28 -> 0.00Hurt
Add same-category distractor objects (ablation)Modular manipulation system · Object distractorsSR: 20.27 -> 18.60 -> 18.00Hurt
Replace SoM grasp prompting with CtoF SoM (ablation)Modular manipulation system with PointToPoint motion planning · Modular system subsetSR: 35.0 -> 27.5Hurt
Replace PointToPoint with Mark-based Grid motion planning (ablation)Modular manipulation system with SoM · Modular system subsetSR: 35.0 -> 15.0Hurt

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: Objaverse GRUtopia assets PartNet-Mobility

Benchmarks: GENMANIP-BENCH

Metrics: success rate SPL

Baselines: CoPA MOKA GR-1 ACT RoboCasa RLBench CALVIN LIBERO

Builds on: CoPA MOKA MimicGen Set-of-Mark prompting PDDL

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy