atlas

Research map / Label-efficient and robust learning / Recognition and long-tail

Yet Another ICU Benchmark: A Flexible Multi-Center Framework for Clinical ML

ICLR 2024 · Label-efficient and robust learning › Recognition and long-tail · approach: Dense features and foundation priors · 8 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Introduces YAIB, a modular, reproducible multi-dataset benchmark framework for ICU clinical prediction tasks, with baselines across MIMIC-III/IV, eICU, HiRID, and AmsterdamUMCdb and analysis of how cohort and preprocessing choices shift performance.

Problem

Clinical ICU prediction models are hard to compare and reproduce because datasets, cohort definitions, preprocessing and training setups vary, and existing benchmarks are hard-coded for single datasets and fixed tasks.

Approach

An end-to-end, modular framework that harmonizes multiple open ICU datasets (via ricu concepts), defines cohorts and prediction tasks in a dataset-independent, configurable way, and trains/evaluates ML and DL models through gin-config files, so that task or preprocessing variations are transparent and reproducible.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Add dynamic feature generation (ablation)Classical ML models for ICU mortality · ICU mortality, AUMC, HiRID, eICU, and MIMIC-IVAUROC: LR: 82.2±0.5 -> 83.7±0.6 (AUMC); 81.8±0.7 -> 84.0±0.3 (HiRID); 81.1±0.1 -> 84.8±0.2 (eICU); 80.2±0.3 -> 86.1±0.1 (MIMIC-Helped
Add static features (ablation)ICU mortality models · ICU mortality, AUMC, HiRID, eICU, and MIMIC-IVAUROC: LR with/without static: 83.7±0.6 / 82.9±0.6; 84.0±0.3 / 82.8±0.7; 84.8±0.2 / 84.3±0.2; 86.1±0.1 / 84.3±0.3Helped
Allow ICU stays of 24–30 hours rather than excluding them (ablation)ICU mortality cohort on HiRID · HiRIDAUROC: LR: 84.0±0.3 -> 87.2±0.4; LGBM: 84.5±0.3 -> 87.9±0.5; GRU: 84.8±0.2 -> 88.2±0.3; TCN: 84.6±0.7 -> 87.8±0.2; TF: 84.9±0.7Helped
Use the paper's clinically actionable sepsis definition requiring antibiotics continuously for ≥3 days (ablation)Sepsis prediction models · Sepsis, MIMIC-IVAUPRC: LGBM: 10.5±0.0 -> 4.3±0.0; GRU: 17.7±0.0 -> 6.1±0.0Hurt
Replace the paper's sepsis definition with the alternative definition (ablation)Sepsis prediction models · Sepsis, MIMIC-IVAUROC: GRU: 79.2±0.1 -> 80.9±0.0 -> 89.2±0.0Mixed
Use GRU instead of classical ML for AKI predictionICU prediction models · AKI across AUMC, HiRID, eICU, and MIMIC-IVAUROC: GRU: 90.6±0.3, 82.2±0.2, 90.9±0.0, 90.7±0.1; best classical: 85.8±0.3, 80.2±0.2, 84.6±0.1, 83.8±0.1Helped
Fine-tune an eICU GRU on HiRID samples instead of training from scratchGRU for ICU mortality · HiRIDAUROCHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MIMIC-III MIMIC-IV eICU HiRID AmsterdamUMCdb MIMIC-III demo eICU demo

Benchmarks: YAIB ICU mortality task YAIB AKI task YAIB sepsis task YAIB kidney function task YAIB length of stay task

Metrics: AUROC AUPRC MAE

Baselines: LR EN LGBM GRU LSTM TCN Transformer Clairvoyance TemporAI PyHealth HiRID benchmark

Builds on: ricu gin-config PyTorch Lightning scikit-optimize

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy