atlas

Research map / 3D vision / Human pose estimation

MultiGO: Towards Multi-level Geometry Learning for Monocular 3D Textured Human Reconstruction

CVPR 2025 · 3D vision › Human pose estimation · approach: Human shape and pose regression · 6 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MultiGO, a multi-level geometry learning framework for monocular 3D textured human reconstruction that adds skeleton-level Fourier-projection features, joint-level depth augmentation, and diffusion-style wrinkle refinement on top of an object Gaussian reconstruction model.

Problem

Monocular 3D clothed human reconstruction suffers from single-view ambiguity; existing SMPL(-X)-prior or generative methods capture only general body geometry, yielding inaccurate skeletons, wrong joint positions, and unclear cloth wrinkles.

Approach

Projects 3D Fourier features of the SMPL-X point cloud into 2D from three views and fuses them with image features in a Gaussian reconstruction UNet (SLE); randomly perturbs SMPL-X joint parameters during training (JLA) for robustness to depth-prior errors; and treats the coarse normal map as a noised latent to refine with a fine-tuned latent diffusion UNet (WLR).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add the SLE projection of 3D Fourier features into 2D (ablation)MultiGO · CustomHuman and THuman3.0f-score: 31.624 -> 42.425; 35.086 -> 46.091Helped
add the SMPL-X shape prior (ablation)MultiGO · CustomHuman and THuman3.0f-score: 33.295 -> 42.425; 37.685 -> 46.091Helped
use three projection views instead of two (ablation)MultiGO SLE · CustomHuman and THuman3.0f-score: 38.651 -> 42.425; 43.255 -> 46.091Helped
use three projection views instead of one (ablation)MultiGO SLE · CustomHuman and THuman3.0f-score: 36.835 -> 42.425; 42.802 -> 46.091Helped
add JLA perturbations at α=0.25 instead of using α=0.10 (ablation)MultiGO · CustomHuman and THuman3.0f-score: 41.418 -> 42.425; 44.008 -> 46.091Helped
add JLA perturbations at α=0.25 (ablation)MultiGO · CustomHuman and THuman3.0f-score: 40.429 -> 42.425; 43.166 -> 46.091Helped
add WLR (ablation)MultiGO · CustomHuman and THuman3.0f-score: 42.081 -> 42.425; 45.525 -> 46.091Helped
add SLE (ablation)MultiGO · CustomHuman and THuman3.0LPIPS F/B: 0.0497/0.0750 -> 0.0414/0.0643; 0.0575/0.0676 -> 0.0457/0.0616Helped
add JLA (ablation)MultiGO · CustomHuman and THuman3.0LPIPS F/B: 0.0465/0.0666 -> 0.0414/0.0643; 0.0541/0.0657 -> 0.0457/0.0616Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: THuman2.0 CustomHuman THuman3.0

Benchmarks: CustomHuman THuman3.0

Metrics: Chamfer distance normal consistency f-score LPIPS SSIM PSNR

Baselines: PIFu GTA ICON ECON VS HiLo SiFU SiTH

Builds on: Gaussian reconstruction model (Szymanowicz et al.) LRM SMPL-X latent diffusion model SiTH

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy