atlas

Research map / Video / Video segmentation and tracking

LATTE-MV: Learning to Anticipate Table Tennis Hits from Monocular Videos

CVPR 2025 · Video › Video segmentation and tracking · approach: Physics-inspired motion prediction · 1 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Reconstructs ~50 hours of monocular table tennis broadcast video into 3D exchanges (73,222) and trains an uncertainty-aware transformer with conformal prediction to pre-position a simulated KUKA arm, raising ball return rate from 49.9% to 59.0%.

Problem

Robots struggle against professional table tennis players in fast rallies because they cannot anticipate opponent shots, and prior anticipation work is limited by small in-house datasets.

Approach

Scalable pipeline that reconstructs 3D player SMPL meshes and ball trajectories from monocular online competition videos (camera calibration from table corners, parabolic bounce detection, projectile fit with Stokes drag), then trains a transformer on the resulting dataset to forecast opponent shots with ensemble-based conformal prediction regions used to pre-position a robot.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use anticipatory predictions to pre-position the robot before the opponent hitsKUKA robotic arm table-tennis controller · Simulation held-out test exchangesball return rate: 49.9% -> 59.0%Helped
Use anticipatory predictions to pre-position the robot before the opponent hitsKUKA robotic arm table-tennis controller · Simulation held-out test exchangesreturn accuracy (mean deviation from target bounce point): 0.497 m -> 0.463 mHelped
Use anticipatory predictions to pre-position the robot before the opponent hitsKUKA robotic arm table-tennis controller · Simulation held-out test exchangespose accuracy (position error / orientation error): 0.25 m / 13.3◦ -> 0.19 m / 9.86◦Helped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: online table tennis competition recordings (~800 h raw, ~50 h gameplay) 10,000 manually labeled ball frames for TrackNetV3 fine-tuning

Benchmarks: held-out table tennis test set of 1,000 exchanges (simulated KUKA arm in MuJoCo)

Metrics: ball return rate return accuracy pose accuracy empirical conformal coverage reprojection error

Baselines: Non-anticipatory baseline controller Oracle pre-positioning

Builds on: HMR 2.0 TrackNetV3 YOLOv8 conformal prediction IDDM

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy