atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Point cloud classification

PAPR in Motion: Seamless Point-level 3D Scene Interpolation

CVPR 2024 · Point clouds › Point cloud classification · approach: Scene flow and dynamic point clouds · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes point-level 3D scene interpolation between two observed scene states and PAPR in Motion, which fine-tunes a PAPR point-based renderer from start to end state with rigidity and local-averaging regularizers to produce smooth interpolations.

Problem

Synthesizing smooth, physically plausible point-level interpolations and novel views of a 3D scene observed only at two distinct states (multi-view images), without any intermediate supervision, where geometry may change substantially and non-rigidly.

Approach

Treat the start-state PAPR model as a geometry-agnostic scene template, fine-tune only point coordinates to fit the end state, and use the optimization trajectory as Lagrangian interpolation; add a local distance preservation loss and periodic local displacement averaging to keep motion cohesive, and interpolate appearance parameters by travelled-distance progress.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Use PAPR in Motion instead of Dynamic Gaussianpoint-level 3D scene interpolation · Synthetic scenes (Avg)SI-FID: 194.64 -> 120.30Helped
Use PAPR in Motion instead of Dynamic Gaussianpoint-level 3D scene interpolation · Real-world scenes (Avg)SI-FID: 280.24 -> 199.74Helped
Use PAPR in Motion instead of Dynamic Gaussianpoint-level 3D scene interpolation · Synthetic scenes (Avg)SI-CD: 9.68 -> 3.94Helped
Use PAPR in Motion instead of Dynamic Gaussianpoint-level 3D scene interpolation · Real-world scenes (Avg)SI-CD: 37.13 -> 9.05Helped
Use PAPR in Motion instead of Dynamic Gaussianpoint-level 3D scene interpolation · Synthetic scenes (Avg)SI-EMD: 31.49 -> 12.62Helped
Use PAPR in Motion instead of Dynamic Gaussianpoint-level 3D scene interpolation · Real-world scenes (Avg)SI-EMD: 95.31 -> 53.02Helped
Add local displacement averaging step (LDAS) (ablation)PAPR in Motion · Giraffeinterpolation geometry qualityHelped
Add local distance preserving loss (Lrigid) (ablation)PAPR in Motion · Giraffeinterpolation geometry qualityHelped

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: NeRF Synthetic Objaverse manually captured real-world scenes

Benchmarks: Scene Interpolation metric on synthetic and real-world scenes

Metrics: SI-FID SI-CD SI-EMD

Baselines: Dynamic Gaussian

Builds on: PAPR 3D Gaussian Splatting Dynamic Gaussian LPIPS

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy