atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / LLM agents

Assemble Your Crew: Automatic Multi-agent Communication Topology Design via Autoregressive Graph Generation

AAAI 2026 · Multi-agent systems and games › LLM agents · approach: LLM multi-agent decision making · 2 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Reframes LLM multi-agent topology design as conditional autoregressive graph generation, using a GRU-based node/edge generator trained with a two-stage curriculum to build task-specific agent graphs from scratch.

Problem

Existing automated MAS topology design starts from fixed template graphs and prunes them, causing redundant agent composition and limited extensibility to new agent roles.

Approach

Construct the collaboration graph node-by-node from scratch conditioned on the task query: a GRU node generator selects roles from an extensible role pool via metric-learning retrieval, and an edge GRU decides incoming links, trained with a cold-start on dense graphs then efficiency fine-tuning on pruned/simple graphs.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
add efficiency fine-tuning phase (vs w/o fine-tune) (ablation)ARG-Designer · MMLUaccuracy (%): 88.23 -> 89.54Helped
add efficiency fine-tuning phase (vs w/o fine-tune) (ablation)ARG-Designer · GSM8Kaccuracy (%): 94.70 -> 94.40Hurt
add efficiency fine-tuning phase (vs w/o fine-tune) (ablation)ARG-Designer · Average over MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEvalaccuracy (%): 91.28 -> 91.89Helped
remove task query embedding (ablation)ARG-Designer · MMLUaccuracy (%): 89.54 -> 86.93Hurt
add historical role embedding (GRU_prev) (ablation)ARG-Designer · Average over MMLU, GSM8K, HumanEvalaccuracy (%): 90.64 -> 91.89Helped
use ARG-Designer autoregressive generation instead of G-Designer template approachMAS topology design · Six benchmarks averageaccuracy (%): 90.04 -> 92.78Helped
switch from G-Designer to ARG-Designer on AQuAMAS topology design · AQuAaccuracy (%): 81.60 -> 86.45Helped
robustness to system prompt attack under ARG-DesignerMAS topology design · Robustness attackperformance degradation (%): 2.15 degradationHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: MMLU GSM8K MultiArith SVAMP AQuA HumanEval

Benchmarks: MMLU GSM8K AQuA MultiArith SVAMP HumanEval

Metrics: accuracy Pass@1 token consumption

Baselines: CoT Self-Consistency Chain Tree Complete Graph Random Graph LLM-Debate AgentPrune AgentDropout G-Designer

Builds on: G-Designer AgentPrune AgentDropout GraphRNN LLM-Debate

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy