atlas

Research map / Multi-agent systems and games / Cooperative multi-agent RL

Novelty-Guided Data Reuse for Efficient and Diversified Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning

AAAI 2025 · Multi-agent systems and games › Cooperative multi-agent RL · approach: Cooperative MARL algorithms · 4 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes MANGER, which uses an RND novelty signal to assign extra per-agent Q-network updates on top of QMIX, with a separated critic layer for agent diversity, evaluated on SMAC and Google Research Football.

Problem

Deep MARL in cooperative tasks suffers from poor sample utilization (one update per interaction) and insufficient diversity among agent policies.

Approach

Use RND prediction error as an observation-novelty measure to decide how many extra updates each agent receives from a batch, and split the critic into shared and per-agent independent layers so extra updates affect only that agent's parameters, which also yields diverse behaviors.

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
Apply novelty-guided sample reuse with RND-based per-agent updatesQMIX (MANGER) · SMAC taskswin rateHelped
Apply novelty-guided sample reuse with RND-based per-agent updatesQMIX (MANGER) · GRF taskswin rateHelped
Apply novelty-guided sample reuse with RND-based per-agent updatesQMIX (MANGER) · SMAC-V2 tasksperformanceHelped
Apply novelty-guided sample reuse with RND-based per-agent updatesMANGER · 6h_vs_8ztraining timeNo clear effect
Update agents at different frequencies using noveltyMANGER · SMAC tasksQ-value similarity between agentsHelped
Replace novelty-guided updates with fixed multiple updates (ablation)QMIX with separate Q values · 6h_vs_8zwin rateHurt
Add a separate Q-value module (ablation)QMIX · 6h_vs_8zwin rateHurt
Use RND to target extra updates to novel samples rather than only increasing average update counts (ablation)QMIX with separate Q values · 6h_vs_8zwin rateHelped

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Datasets: SMAC Google Research Football SMAC-V2

Benchmarks: SMAC Google Research Football SMAC-V2

Metrics: test win rate training time

Baselines: QMIX QPLEX QATTEN

Builds on: QMIX RND CDS PyMARL2

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy