atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Submodular and game algorithms

Multiple Mean-Payoff Optimization Under Local Stability Constraints

AAAI 2025 · Learning theory and algorithms › Submodular and game algorithms · approach: Correlated equilibria in sequential games · 0 citations (OpenAlex)

Read the paperCheck your idea against 108,967 papers

AI-extracted summary. Written by AI from the paper's full text. Numbers and claims can be wrong or missing context, so check the paper before you cite or build on it.

Proposes a differentiable dynamic-programming strategy synthesis method that optimizes multiple window mean payoffs (local stability) over finite-memory randomized strategies in MDPs, trading optimality for scalability.

Problem

Synthesizing controllers in MDPs that simultaneously optimize multiple mean payoffs while enforcing local stability via window mean payoffs; the exact problem is NP-hard and no scalable algorithm existed.

Approach

Computes the expected value of a decomposable evaluation function over window mean payoffs via a dynamic programming procedure over representatives (differentiable), enabling gradient-based strategy improvement with random-restart gradient descent over finite-memory randomized strategies (WINMPSYNT).

Key results

Measured effects reported in the paper

What was changedWhereMeasuredEffect
use the dynamic-programming evaluation procedure instead of the DFS-based procedureWINMPSYNT · Dℓ instances with ℓ=d, 4≤ℓ≤30training-step time: less than one second; DFS reaches the 20 secs timeout for ℓ=d≤20Helped
increase the number of memory states assigned to each vertexWINMPSYNT · Dℓ scenarios grouped by optimal memory requirement Kℓ,daverage strategy value (wval)Helped
use randomized strategies when memory is below the amount required by an optimal strategyWINMPSYNT · Dℓ scenariosstrategy value (wval)Helped
select the best of 500 constructed strategies for each scenarioWINMPSYNT · Dℓ scenariosbest strategy wval: 40% of scenarios ≤ 0; 52% ≤ 0.05; 100% ≤ 0.1Helped
evaluate the full set of constructed strategies rather than selecting the best per scenarioWINMPSYNT · All Dℓ scenarios and memory sizesstrategy value (wval): 6% ≤ 0; 27% ≤ 0.1; 99.8% ≤ 0.3Mixed

Surprising findings

Limitations

Experimental setup

Benchmarks: parameterized ring graphs D_l with window length d scenarios (l,d in [2,20])

Metrics: normalized Eval value (wval) average training step time fraction of scenarios reaching optimal bound

Baselines: DFS-based evaluation procedure

Builds on: window mean payoff (Chatterjee et al. 2015) multiple mean-payoff MDP optimization (Brázdil et al. 2011) PyTorch automatic differentiation with Adam

Closest papers by meaning

Writing a paper in this area? scime draft is a free LaTeX editor with AI included, real-time co-authors and a check of your references and venue rules before you submit. It also imports OpenAI Prism projects.

Open scime draft

Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy