AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Point clouds / Registration and matching

Non-rigid point set registration

Align point sets with rigid and non-rigid transformations using coherent drift, graph consistency and transformers.

42 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Registration and matching, keyword cluster “rigid · point registration · non”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

9 papers in 2023–24 and 6 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 25.7% to 13.0%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 3162017: 3172018: 3182019: 5192020: 4202021: 3212022: 6222023: 6232024: 3242025: 3252026: 326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

39 papers here report 356 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 21%, mixed 6%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use TEAR-1 rather than CM-1 as the branch-and-bound objectiveSynthetic data, 95% outliers · F1-scoreHelpedScalable 3D Registration via Truncated Entry-wise Absolute Residuals (CVPR 2024 · 12 citations)
Reintegrate predicted overlap scores into attention learning3DLoMatch · RR (%)0.791 -> 0.812HelpedMultiway Point Cloud Mosaicking with Diffusion and Global Optimization (CVPR 2024 · 11 citations)
use Coupled Laplacian eigenmaps instead of Euclidean point distancesMVTec 3D-AD · area under PRO curve (limit 0.3), mean0.703 -> 0.748HelpedCoupled Laplacian Eigenmaps for Locally-Aware 3D Rigid Point Cloud Matching (CVPR 2024 · 6 citations)
Represent rotation with quaternions instead of Euler anglesModelNet40, completely overlapping · MAE(R)13.7668 -> 1.6935HelpedWhere Precision Meets Efficiency: Transformation Diffusion Model for Point Cloud Registration (AAAI 2025 · 4 citations)
Add pose refinement (+R)PhotoTourism · AUC@1073.73 -> 77.00HelpedPractical Solutions to the Relative Pose of Three Calibrated Cameras (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 7 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • 3DMatch · 4 of 7 papers
  • KITTI · 3 of 7 papers

Baselines

  • FGR · 3 of 7 papers
  • ICP · 2 of 7 papers
  • REGTR · 2 of 7 papers
  • FPFH · 2 of 7 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 29 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy