AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Kernels and regression theory

Neural tangent kernel analysis

Study wide networks via the neural tangent kernel and feature-learning limits.

109 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2016–2026) · an approach in Kernels and regression theory, keyword cluster “kernels · hilbert · reproducing”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

26 papers in 2023–24 and 30 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 10.5% to 12.1%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 1162017: 3172018: 6182019: 3192020: 14202021: 16212022: 10222023: 13232024: 13242025: 20252026: 1026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

86 papers here report 647 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 64%, no clear effect 11%, hurt 17%, mixed 8%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Remove weight decay (set λ = 0)Rich-regime convergence · agreement with aNTK predictorHurtAdaptive kernel predictors from feature-learning infinite limits of neural networks (ICML 2025 · 1 citation)
Use A1 random features without Gibbs samplingCT · MSE199.15 -> 183.63HelpedOptimized Random Features for the Neural Tangent Kernel (Student Abstract) (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Use least-squares coefficient calculation instead of the inner-product methodTransfer benchmarks · performanceHelpedFunction Encoders: A Principled Approach to Transfer Learning in Hilbert Spaces (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add one-loop fluctuation corrections to the tree-level solutionIsing task, standard scaling · test error prediction accuracyHelpedFrom Kernels to Features: A Multi-Scale Adaptive Theory of Feature Learning (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
add batch normalization layersPDE benchmarks · test errorNo clear effectA Bregman Proximal Viewpoint on Neural Operators (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Change LayerNorm placement among every layer, first layer only, and second layer onlyUCI Protein OOD · R²0.50 ± 0.02; 0.50 ± 0.02; 0.50 ± 0.01No clear effectJust One Layer Norm Guarantees Stable Extrapolation (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Use stronger shortcut correlationDataset with varied shortcut-label correlation · availabilityHelpedShortcut Features as Top Eigenfunctions of NTK: A Linear Neural Network Case and More (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
use cosine-normalized trace NTK instead of unnormalized trNTK⁰CIFAR10 poisoned-data experiment, clean test · Kendall-τ0.344 -> 0.643HelpedFaithful and Efficient Explanations for Neural Networks via Neural Tangent Kernel Surrogate Models (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)
Set damping coefficient γ=√L instead of γ=1Continuous-time convergence · energy-gap decay rateO(\mathscr{C}_{\textsf{LSI}}/\mathscr{L}) -> O(\mathscr{C}_{\textsf{LSI}}/\sqrt{\mathscr{L}})HelpedMean-field Underdamped Langevin Dynamics and its Spacetime Discretization (ICML 2024 · 0 citations)
replace Euclidean similarity with Manhattan similaritycapacity, memorization criterion; MNIST, CIFAR10, and Tiny ImageNet · fraction correctly retrieved0.624 ± 0.22 -> 0.793 ± 0.14; 0.223 ± 0.19 -> 0.502 ± 0.24; 0.223 ± 0.21 -> 0.669 ± 0.24HelpedRelating Hopfield Networks to Episodic Control (NeurIPS 2024 · 0 citations)
vary polynomial order NγJetplane image reconstruction · PSNR (dB)MixedLearning Input Encodings for Kernel-Optimal Implicit Neural Representations (ICML 2025)
Remove the learnable grid contribution from MPEImage regression on ImageNet synonym sets · NTK eigenvalue spectrumHurtHow Learnable Grids Recover Fine Detail in Low Dimensions: A Neural Tangent Kernel Analysis of Multigrid Parametric Encodings (ICLR 2025)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 22 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 5 of 22 papers
  • CIFAR10 · 2 of 22 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 56 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy