AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Learning theory and algorithms / Fairness

Post-processing and transport for fairness

Adjust or transform classifiers, often via optimal transport, to remove discrimination while preserving utility.

101 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Fairness, keyword cluster “fair · classifier · classification”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

43 papers in 2023–24 and 23 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 25.7% to 16.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 1172018: 7182019: 8192020: 5202021: 4212022: 10222023: 24232024: 19242025: 10252026: 1326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

82 papers here report 696 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 57%, no clear effect 12%, hurt 22%, mixed 8%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add an initial bagging pass before ensembling with abstentionOld Adult · Wasserstein-1 distance of self-consistency distributions.063 -> .014HelpedArbitrariness and Social Prediction: The Confounding Role of Variance in Fair Classification (AAAI 2024 · 18 citations)
Use only the two largest sensitive groups instead of four groupsACS datasets · equalized-odds violation0.38 ... 0.16HelpedUnprocessing Seven Years of Algorithmic Fairness (ICLR 2024 · 4 citations)
set α=2 rather than α=1NYU-v2 (3-task) · Δm%-2.79 -> -4.96HelpedFair Resource Allocation in Multi-Task Learning (ICML 2024 · 4 citations)
Remove the causal edge from X to the proxy label Y_PCOMPAS · FNR bound informativenessHelpedThe Fragility of Fairness: Causal Sensitivity Analysis for Fair Machine Learning (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
add the weighted entropy formulationArrhythmia, asymmetric shift A=0 · Error %28.648 (3.079) -> 27.648 (2.978)HelpedFairness under Covariate Shift: Improving Fairness-Accuracy Tradeoff with Few Unlabeled Test Samples (AAAI 2024 · 2 citations)
Use both λ₁ and λ₂ rather than λ₁ aloneCOMPAS classification · Utility (accuracy)66.45}{ (0.85) -> 66.80}{ (0.27)HelpedTowards Harmless Rawlsian Fairness Regardless of Demographic Prior (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
add the fairness regularization termD&S · MNCE0.585 -> 0.985HelpedFair Kernel K-Means: from Single Kernel to Multiple Kernel (NeurIPS 2024 · 1 citation)
Add interpolated training dataMultiple group settings · fairness improvementHelpedWho’s the (Multi-)Fairest of Them All: Rethinking Interpolation-Based Data Augmentation Through the Lens of Multicalibration (AAAI 2025 · 0 citations)
Use FairICP instead of FairCP, with ICP-generated sensitive-attribute permutationsSimulation studies · prediction loss–KPC trade-offHelpedFairICP: Encouraging Equalized Odds via Inverse Conditional Permutation (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Add SAM to the methodDFDC · Min/Max0.9656 -> 0.9771HelpedPreserving AUC Fairness in Learning with Noisy Protected Groups (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Increase FmCF penalty-estimation batch sizeAdult, German, Compas, Health · standard deviation of penalty estimatorAdult: 0.1150 -> 0.0007; German: 0.1252 -> 0.0000; Compas: 0.0924 -> 0.0007; Health: 0.1004 -> 0.0009HelpedSimple and Effective Specialized Representations for Fair Classifiers (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)
Relax exact demographic-parity equalities to double-sided inequalities with ε=10⁻⁴COMPAS · group disparityNo clear effectLearning with Statistical Equality Constraints (NeurIPS 2025 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 12 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • Adult · 5 of 12 papers
  • COMPAS · 4 of 12 papers
  • ACSIncome · 2 of 12 papers
  • CheXpert · 2 of 12 papers
  • Crime · 2 of 12 papers
  • Law School · 2 of 12 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 66 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 40 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy