AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Large language models / Agents, code and math

Neural program synthesis and transpilation

Guide program synthesis, translation, and robot programs with learned models and probabilistic programs.

31 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Agents, code and math, keyword cluster “search · optimization · decision”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

12 papers in 2023–24 and 8 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 3.3% to 0.6%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 3172018: 1182019: 2192020: 2202021: 1212022: 2222023: 6232024: 6242025: 3252026: 526

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

23 papers here report 196 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 9%, hurt 18%, mixed 4%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add few-shot promptingIaC-Eval · pass@1 accuracy19.36% -> 10.64%HurtIaC-Eval: A Code Generation Benchmark for Cloud Infrastructure-as-Code Programs (NeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations)
Add synthetic-sketch trainingReference figures · average performance across reported metricsMTE -1.957; CBLEU +0.327; TED -0.822; DSIM +2.433; SSIM +1.318; KID +3.296MixedDeTikZify: Synthesizing Graphics Programs for Scientific Figures and Sketches with TikZ (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Add causal-discovery feedback across rounds instead of using DATA's single roundAppleGastronome · F10.72±0.04 -> 0.85±0.11HelpedDiscovery of the Hidden World with Large Language Models (NeurIPS 2024 · 3 citations)
Use feature-set prediction instead of directly prompting for a predictorPopulation Density · L2 log0.3159 -> 0.2906HelpedDiSciPLE: Learning Interpretable Programs for Scientific Visual Discovery (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
Add functional specification learning onlyPerformance optimization (HQ test) · OPT@847.5 -> 49.2HelpedEditLord: Learning Code Transformation Rules for Code Editing (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
Use AI Programmer data rather than the other individual data sourcesAssist Programming Eval · Pass@1HelpedCursorCore: Assist Programming through Aligning Anything (ICML 2025 · 0 citations)
vary confidence threshold gamma from 0.8 to 0.95Project Euler · number of corrected programsNo clear effectGuess & Sketch: Language Model Guided Transpilation (ICLR 2024 · 0 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 9 papers of this approach from 2024–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • The Stack · 2 of 9 papers

Baselines

  • GPT-4o · 2 of 9 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 20 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 29 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy