AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

Flow matching distillation

Distill and align flow matching models into few-step generators.

95 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2022–2026) · an approach in Fast diffusion sampling, keyword cluster “flow · matching · rectified”

State History Tried Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Not enough benchmark data Fewer than four papers report the same benchmark, so there is no record to follow.

9 papers in 2023–24 and 85 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 2.0% to 6.4%.

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 0172018: 0182019: 0192020: 0202021: 0212022: 1222023: 1232024: 8242025: 32252026: 5326

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

What has been tried

41 papers here report 486 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 71%, no clear effect 3%, hurt 22%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Add Hidden State DenoisingSintel train clean · EPE0.93 -> 0.86HelpedFlowDiffuser: Advancing Optical Flow Estimation with Diffusion Models (CVPR 2024 · 42 citations)
use image-to-depth transport rather than noise-to-depth transportNYUv2 · δ192.4 -> 94.6HelpedDepthFM: Fast Generative Monocular Depth Estimation with Flow Matching (AAAI 2025 · 37 citations)
Add NER to NewImpCC MAR 30% missing · MAE0.61 -> 0.35HelpedRethinking the Diffusion Models for Missing Data Imputation: A Gradient Flow Perspective (NeurIPS 2024 · 17 citations)
add adversarial GAN lossCIFAR-10 image generation · sample qualityHelpedConsistency Trajectory Models: Learning Probability Flow ODE Trajectory of Diffusion (ICLR 2024 · 16 citations)
Use sin-cos matching instead of linear flow matchingCOCO validation · FID-30K9.63 -> 8.95HelpedFlowing from Words to Pixels: A Noise-Free Framework for Cross-Modality Evolution (CVPR 2025 · 11 citations)
distill the sampling process into a one-step studentPromoter DNA sequence design · MSE.0269 -> .0278HurtDirichlet Flow Matching with Applications to DNA Sequence Design (ICML 2024 · 10 citations)
Limit trainable parameters with LoRA rather than full fine-tuningNYUv2 · AbsRel5.7 -> 5.9HurtDiff2Flow: Training Flow Matching Models via Diffusion Model Alignment (CVPR 2025 · 7 citations)
Add GAN loss to consistency distillationCelebA-HQ 256, 1 NFE · FID41.34 -> 11.55HelpedSelf-Corrected Flow Distillation for Consistent One-Step and Few-Step Image Generation (AAAI 2025 · 2 citations)
use hierarchical optical-flow diffusion instead of latent-space denoisingSNU-FILM hard · FID22.283 -> 15.320HelpedHierarchical Flow Diffusion for Efficient Frame Interpolation (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
Add test-time ensemblingFlyingChairs validation · EPE3.45 -> 3.08HelpedScaling Properties of Diffusion Models For Perceptual Tasks (CVPR 2025 · 2 citations)
Add Semantic Feature GuidanceImageNet 256×256 · FID81.5 -> 66.9HelpedBlockwise Flow Matching: Improving Flow Matching Models For Efficient High-Quality Generation (NeurIPS 2025 · 2 citations)
use t-EDM with ν=5 instead of ν=3HRRR VIL (Test) · KS0.114 -> 0.888HurtHeavy-Tailed Diffusion Models (ICLR 2025 · 2 citations)

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 46 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • ImageNet · 8 of 46 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 7 of 46 papers
  • ImageNet-1K · 5 of 46 papers
  • FFHQ · 5 of 46 papers
  • NYUv2 · 4 of 46 papers
  • KITTI · 3 of 46 papers
  • ETH3D · 3 of 46 papers
  • ScanNet · 3 of 46 papers

Baselines

  • CTM · 4 of 46 papers
  • EDM · 4 of 46 papers
  • Marigold · 3 of 46 papers
  • DPM Solver · 3 of 46 papers
  • iCT · 3 of 46 papers
  • ADM · 3 of 46 papers
  • DiT-XL/2 · 3 of 46 papers
  • SiT-XL/2 · 3 of 46 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 94 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 22 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy