AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Image generation / Fast diffusion sampling

Distributional control of diffusion

Steer pretrained generators for diversity, minority sampling, and distribution-level guidance.

109 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Fast diffusion sampling, keyword cluster “score · distribution · denoising diffusion”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Quiet None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

34 papers in 2023–24 and 56 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic shrank, from 7.4% to 4.2%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: CIFAR-10 (FID, last in 2023).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 1172018: 2182019: 0192020: 0202021: 10212022: 6222023: 15232024: 19242025: 16252026: 4026

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

CIFAR-10 · FID (lower is better)

7 papers, 2018–2023 · not reported since 2023

2018: 49.52021: 12.812023: 10.69
20182023

What has been tried

65 papers here report 711 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 69%, no clear effect 6%, hurt 22%, mixed 3%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
Use a random time step scheduleText-to-3D prompts in Figure 6 · geometry and texture qualityHurtConsistent3D: Towards Consistent High-Fidelity Text-to-3D Generation with Deterministic Sampling Prior (CVPR 2024 · 18 citations)
add the k-d tree to accelerate vicinal-loss neighbor searchUneven · speedup2.7HelpedCcDPM: A Continuous Conditional Diffusion Probabilistic Model for Inverse Design (AAAI 2024 · 12 citations)
Set entropy regularization strength λ to 1Michelangelo-style statue of dog reading news on a cellphone · texture realismHurtTaming Mode Collapse in Score Distillation for Text-to-3D Generation (CVPR 2024 · 12 citations)
Add decomposed unconditional and conditional single-hand modelingInterHand2.6M test, two-hand synthesis · FHID2.09 -> 1.00HelpedInterHandGen: Two-Hand Interaction Generation via Cascaded Reverse Diffusion (CVPR 2024 · 11 citations)
add the physical stability checkerShapeNet-v2, mean of chair, table, airplane, and sofa · PSS0.755 -> 0.775HelpedGPLD3D: Latent Diffusion of 3D Shape Generative Models by Enforcing Geometric and Physical Priors (CVPR 2024 · 9 citations)
replace quickshift with felzenszwalb segmentationCUB-200-2011 (probability) · accuracy55.47% -> 59.33%HelpedFully Exploiting Every Real Sample: SuperPixel Sample Gradient Model Stealing (CVPR 2024 · 8 citations)
Add a negative prompt to CSDTexture synthesis · visual qualityHelpedText-to-3D with Classifier Score Distillation (ICLR 2024 · 8 citations)
apply guidance with weight 2 instead of guidance 0ImageNet 64x64 · FID25.3 -> 5.7HelpedNormalizing Flows are Capable Generative Models (ICML 2025 · 4 citations)
Replace resampled Gaussian noise with DDIM-inversion-inferred noiseText-to-3D · visual generation qualityHelpedScore Distillation via Reparametrized DDIM (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Vary the negative-prompt descriptorsText-to-image generation · Visual qualityNo clear effectRethinking Score Distillation as a Bridge Between Image Distributions (NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations)
Train with multi-view images and augmentations instead of single-view images without augmentationsShapeNet chairs subset · F-Score0.321 -> 0.452HelpedDI-PCG: Diffusion-based Efficient Inverse Procedural Content Generation for High-quality 3D Asset Creation (CVPR 2025 · 3 citations)
add model adaptationCelebA-HQ · LPIPST1.45 ± 0.05 -> 1.07 ± 0.07HelpedIMPUS: Image Morphing with Perceptually-Uniform Sampling Using Diffusion Models (ICLR 2024 · 3 citations)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
PixelCNN++CIFAR-10FID54.25 – 65.92 papers, e.g. ICLR 2021 and ICML 2018

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 25 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • CelebA · 5 of 25 papers
  • ImageNet · 4 of 25 papers
  • CIFAR-10 · 4 of 25 papers
  • COCO · 3 of 25 papers
  • Pascal VOC · 2 of 25 papers
  • MNIST · 2 of 25 papers

Baselines

  • Glow · 2 of 25 papers
  • VDM · 2 of 25 papers
  • NFDM · 2 of 25 papers
  • EDM · 2 of 25 papers
  • iDDPM · 2 of 25 papers
  • ADM · 2 of 25 papers
  • BigGAN · 2 of 25 papers
  • CADS · 2 of 25 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 90 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 36 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy