AI Paper Atlas

Research map / Graph learning / Graph algorithms and clustering

Anchor-based multi-view clustering

Scale multi-view clustering with anchor graphs and alignment.

31 accepted papers at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI (2017–2026) · an approach in Graph algorithms and clustering, keyword cluster “graph clustering · spectral clustering · clusters”

State History Benchmarks Tried Baselines Checklist Preprints Who Export

Where it stands

Few recent reports None of the tracked benchmarks has a report from 2025–26.

7 papers in 2023–24 and 14 in 2025–26 (at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI); its share of the topic grew, from 3.6% to 7.0%.

Open questions the data points to

No longer reported by papers here: Reuters (ACC, last in 2024).

How this is decided

A benchmark is tracked when at least four papers of this approach report their own method on the same dataset and metric in at least two different years. Its record is the best number reported up to 2024 compared with the best reported in 2025–26: still improving means at least 1% better, flat means at most 0.2% better with at least two papers from 2025–26 trying. Numbers on a different scale from the rest (a fraction among percentages) and far outliers are left out. Results come from different papers with different setups, so they are signals, not head-to-head comparisons. The share of papers is counted at ICML, NeurIPS, ICLR, CVPR and AAAI.

How it got here

2016: 0162017: 1172018: 0182019: 0192020: 2202021: 2212022: 5222023: 4232024: 3242025: 6252026: 826

Most cited paper of each year

Earliest papers here

Benchmark records

The best number each year that beat every earlier one, among papers of this approach reporting their own method. Numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's text; check the paper before citing.

Reuters · ACC (higher is better)

4 papers, 2020–2024 · not reported since 2024

2020: 0.5892023: 0.6122024: 0.618
20202024

What has been tried

22 papers here report 214 measured changes (a component added, removed or swapped, compared with a baseline): helped 82%, no clear effect 4%, hurt 12%, mixed 2%. Papers mostly publish changes that helped, so "helped" is over-represented.

Ablations in recent papers

What was changedMeasured onResultEffectPaper
add view-unrelated anchors to view-related anchorsCalte101view3 · ACC33.96±1.50 -> 35.55±2.25HelpedA Non-parametric Graph Clustering Framework for Multi-View Data (AAAI 2024 · 31 citations)
Add shared latent clustering structureMSRC · ACC0.7507 -> 0.8819HelpedAnchor Learning with Potential Cluster Constraints for Multi-view Clustering (AAAI 2025 · 25 citations)
Add tensor Schatten p-norm to EFSGMCMSRC · clustering performanceHelpedEmbedded Feature Selection on Graph-Based Multi-View Clustering (AAAI 2024 · 17 citations)
Add adaptive similarity completionNGs, p=0.1 · ACC90.33 -> 100HelpedFast Incomplete Multi-view Clustering with Adaptive Similarity Completion and Reconstruction (AAAI 2025 · 9 citations)
Use k-means anchors instead of DAS anchorsProkaryotic · ACCover 15%HelpedHighly Efficient Rotation-Invariant Spectral Embedding for Scalable Incomplete Multi-View Clustering (AAAI 2025 · 3 citations)
remove image featuresT. of London, M. Rushmore, E. Island · mean position error22.09 -> 37.78HurtLearning to Filter Outlier Edges in Global SfM (CVPR 2025 · 0 citations)
add perturbation generation network and anchor learning lossYale · ACC66.02 -> 78.18HelpedTowards Learnable Anchor for Deep Multi-View Clustering (AAAI 2025)
use a unified framework instead of separating graph construction, anchor learning, and graph partitionORL · ACC (%)70.60±0.20 -> 78.84±0.50HelpedFast Incomplete Multi-view Clustering by Flexible Anchor Learning (ICML 2025)

Baseline numbers that disagree

The same baseline on the same benchmark and metric, reported more than 5% apart by different papers here. Training budgets, data splits and reimplementations differ, so state which number you compare with.

BaselineBenchmarkMetricReportedPapers
MLANBBCSportNMI0.689 – 0.9062 papers, e.g. AAAI 2021 and AAAI 2020
BMVCAWANMI0.119 – 0.1372 papers, e.g. AAAI 2023 and AAAI 2022
FPMVSCaltech101-allACC0.285 – 0.3012 papers, e.g. AAAI 2022 and AAAI 2025

What reviewers will expect

Datasets and baselines named in the 7 papers of this approach from 2025–2026 that have a full-text summary. Leaving out the common ones is a frequent review question.

Datasets

  • MNIST · 2 of 7 papers
  • NGs · 2 of 7 papers
  • CCV · 2 of 7 papers
  • WebKB · 2 of 7 papers

Baselines

  • IMVC-CBG · 3 of 7 papers
  • LMVSC · 2 of 7 papers
  • FIMVC-VIA · 2 of 7 papers
  • SIMVC-SA · 2 of 7 papers
  • sFSR-IMVC · 2 of 7 papers
  • DAIMC · 2 of 7 papers

Recent preprints

Loading recent arXiv preprints…

    Who publishes on it

    Institutions on the most papers of this approach since 2023 (of 21 papers; from OpenAlex and the papers' affiliations).

    Use it

    Download BibTeX of 30 key papersOpen the topic in the interactive map

    Get alerts. Describe your idea in scime atlas and save it (free scime account): you get a weekly email when new preprints land close to it.

    Same keyword cluster

    Elsewhere in the topic

    Benchmark numbers, ablations and baseline numbers are extracted by AI from each paper's full text and can be wrong; the paper is the authority. Data: results index of 2026-11-02, citation counts from OpenAlex (2026-10-09).

    Get the next scime Dispatch and a monthly field update

    Free. We send a confirmation link first; every email has a one-click unsubscribe. Privacy